me too.

that's a bit of an over reaction, don't you think? there's something between that and only 2 terms.

i still disagree.

i still wouldn't use that word. that group of men that daryl ''took'' up with , the word applies to them.
they were feral even before, probs just barely keeping themselves within the limits of what's accepted.

you don't have to stick to 2 terms.

ok.

do you only have hard and soft to describe the emotions and behaviors of human beings?
what's next, low moral fiber accusations for those who show any empathy,conflict of emotion, or mercy?

they were dead before the were burned btw, not burned alive as some think.
carol has never been a straight forward character.
there's subjectivity and there's just not understanding human psychology but i do admit that the writing is not always good and that there are many plot holes.
but it's still important to know…

feral dog??? i never saw THAT episode.

kind of sick to spread illness?
you mean very sick and to prevent spreading the illness?!
maggie is pregnant.
i am sorry you don't understand conflicting emotions and characher DEVELOPEMENT.

i still don't agree. dangerous, that were those feral men on the road, and various psychopaths like the governor and Caliban boy.

[nearly] everybody killed people too.

clearing away walkers is hardly blood thirst. they're DEAD!

i can't drink.

2 good episodes out of 5 is still poor. i used to look forward to this.

what a weird analyses.

good points.

he wasn't bloodthirsty, he had a breakdown.

yes, being disturbed after killing so many people rather than being unfazed is going soft.

this was rather good and made me want to see more, after last week i would not have watched again had it not been for the cliff hanger.