Serious question, no sarcasm. Can you please explain to me how this is anti-semitic? The Jewish team don’t appear to be presented as being inferior in any way, the advantages and disadvantages of each side are arguably approximately equal (in the game I mean, not IRL), they don’t appear to be presented as the bad guys…

Ifyou are actually upset about this, you are child.

...Wow, just, kill all the fun! Put the fun in camps, vhy don’t you?!

I’m going to support thier creative freedom here. There’s a good amount of thought put into the mechanics of the game. The mechanics also fit the theme really well. However, the bit about yelling shit at each other should be taken out of the rules.

What a bunch of teenagers being a bit racy and rebelling in some silly not at all harmful way?!?!?! We can’t have that. They should probably take some sort of sensitivity classes or you know just be allowed to be fucking teenagers already, jesus jumping christ.

I don’t get the point here. Obviously they get the holocaust being a bad thing, that’s the whole idea. It’s a horrible thing, that’s why they find it funny. Similar to “dead baby” jokes which have been around forever.

sounds like a fun game. a think any good friends who know its not personal and no one playing that game is really taking it seriously.

Samesies

I’m a Jew and I find this offensive. I also can’t stop laughing and can’t wait to play this.

alcoholocaust, tho

Some people think it has dog-whistle references to the Holocaust.

I say this a full blooded Jew, but that is a great name. It’s so great, I almost (almost) want the name to legitimately catch on as a term for something, like getting really wasted (“I drank so much last night, there’s an alcoholocaust in my stomach right now”) or fucking up a drink in some way, like when the…

Ugh, I am so tired of this discussion. Yes, Oscars are as white as an Irish in a blizzard. I won’t deny that. But I am tired of hearing people like Will Smith whining about the lack of roles. You are worth a quarter of a billion dollars. You have connections and influence all over Hollywood. You are not some bum off…

You are wrong. Jackie is a terrible human being, and she has ruined multiple people’s lives. She deserves every bit of vilification she’s getting.

i doubt it was an innocent mistake. notice how your post was ignored on here. people want to believe what they want to believe, facts be damned

Well buried in the paper is a paragraph that seems to indicate that there is a similar effect for mothers of daughters versus mothers of sons, i.e. working moms are more likely to take parental leave if it’s a daughter versus a son:

I’m looking at the study right now, and am a little lost as to how they come to that 50% number. Not because I just don’t understand - I’m pretty well trained in this sort of econometric analysis - but because I think they’re making an (almost certainly innocent) mistake.

These effects are much larger for fathers of sons than for fathers of daughters, and almost entirely driven by fathers of first-born children and fathers in occupations with a high share of female workers.