rywal21
Feminists Nemesis
rywal21

I wanna be juuuust famous enough so I can leverage it into sex with attractive women. I mean really, what else is the point? It seems like a hassle to be famous. Not worth it otherwise.

Can’t stand the guy. He wasn’t wrong about the way women act afterwards if they’re pleased. You’ll wake up in the morning w breakfast and everything.

So you can’t criticize unless you are actively being oppressed at the moment, can’t look out for others if you have succeeded and if you are being “oppressed” then shouldn’t you be looking for a job instead of whining. It is almost as if...

Yes, but the point is that physics defeats biology. Always. You can argue all you want, but you’re simply wrong. If calories in is less than calories out, you lose weight. It doesn’t mean you’re necessarily healthy, and no one is arguing that, but you lose weight.

In terms of weight loss a calorie is just a calorie. At no point did I suggest that 100 calories of chocolate will keep you as filled and satiated as 100 calories of oats or something fibrous would.

I’m not confusing them in the slightest. You can have a perfectly healthy diet and lose no weight, you can have a caloric deficit and not be healthy. The article is about losing weight, not being healthy - the only thing that matters for losing weight is a caloric deficit - how you fill those calories determines how

You can disagree but you’re wrong. In terms of strictly losing weight nothing else matters - obviously you can lose weight on nothing but McDonalds (if your calories are low enough) and you won’t be healthy, but that’s a different matter.