ryanv23
ryanv23
ryanv23

But that assumes the Super Bowl, Final Four and NCAA championship football games are the only reasons to build the stadium. You have 8-10 Raiders games a year, you have UNLV football (ok, hardly a draw but they will still use the stadium) and the possibility of neutral site games between big 5 football teams, you can

T-Mobile holds about 18,00o to 20,000 people depending on the configuration. The last final four was in Phoenix at University of Phoenix stadium with a capacity of 63,400 people. The football national championship game was held at Raymond James Stadium in Tampa with a capacity of 65,890. Vegas does not have a venue

And, based on the way the NFL has been doling out Super Bowls, the stadium will host one within a couple years of opening (frankly, Super Bowl LV has Vegas written all over it). Plus, once the NCAA gets over it’s “gambling” thing, the stadium will be perfect for the Final Four and either a semi-final or championship

Didn’t say it was good or bad, simply pointed out that if that was the only reason for which the United States was a sovereign political entity, there would be no complaints about that on this site.

Only for purpose of confiscating money from the rich and giving it to everyone else, citizen or not.

How else could this be applied? Let me try. Mrs. Clinton, you didn’t lose the election because you are a woman, you lost it because you are an idiot and a liar. Yeah, that seems to work as well.

No, the hoax was that the note was real, not that the threat in the note was a joke, i.e., the African-American woman left the “racist” note on her own car in order to get a reaction from the school and community. She, in essence, tried to convince St. Olaf that the campus was racist without any, you know, actual

I can understand your delving into conspiracy theories but doesn’t it make more sense that Comey wasn’t really trying to swing the election one way or the other, he either just made a bunch of bad decisions (showing incompetence and supporting his being fired) or he wanted to be in the spotlight and important (which

So, the guy who wants to doom her candidacy doesn’t charge her with a crime which will end her candidacy whether she is convicted or not because no one under federal indictment is getting elected president, because he doesn’t have any evidence but then violates all FBI norms by announcing the possibility of new

The thing I’ve never understood, if Comey preferred Trump as a candidate why didn’t he recommend Hilary be charged with a crime. That would have ended her candidacy, full stop, and made it too late for the Democrats to put someone on the ballot with a chance to win. Why wait until October and raise an issue that may

Clearly you failed to take into consideration that you have fallen victim to the “Just World Fallacy”, again.

There are but it wouldn’t take those countries a year and a half to deport you, they’d do it in a day and a half. They are allowed to enforce their borders, the US is not.

“Arbitrary.” You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means.

I guess I missed the violence standard rating scale? Does that go from 1-10 or 1-100. By your thought, a standard metric is also: see this line, if you cross it, you will be punished. The line doesn’t move and it isn’t arbitrary. And, if it is, then I am taking the property of both the houses on each side of mine.

“Deportation should be reserved for violent criminals”

Did you major in philosophy and now realize that you wasted $100,000 on a useless, worthless degree so you are going to show everybody how much you learned by creating a stupid thought experiment that could, literally, be applied to any action “criminalized” by people and which clearly has no applicability in an

Can I strangle him with a red line?

Different standards of proof. The County Attorney has to have evidence of their guilt of a crime (and all the elements of it) beyond a reasonable doubt while the EOAA only needed evidence that they violated the student code of conduct, which is going to be much less strict then the definition of a criminal act and

Yeah, I mean the police, county attorney and a three person panel appeal board all decided they didn’t do anything wrong, even using two different standards of proof, (and in two cases, a second appeal to a provost agreed with the three person panel) but let’t throw all that out the window and go with the EOAA which