It’s she. My point is that the mags do huge digital manipulation; they can change folks’ figures, make their necks longer, thinner, give them better skin, and more. It’s why paparazzi have jobs.

First off, we all know that we can’t believe what we see on the cover of Vanity Fair, or other magazines, right?

And maybe not then.

Think: ME, NT, Vista, 8...

Damn. I’m really glad I read this. I was going to buy one tomorrow.

That would be the efficient solution. I’m no grammarian but I am an educator and English may be the colonial language, but let’s use it accurately.

Give the guy a toke already. But take a video and share it and get him fired?

Your headline suggests that there was a woman vice-chancelor 785 years ago.

@Craig Jeffries: That story is seriously the best. Thank you.

“In this sense it is no different from the driving ban on women in Saudi Arabia. That it masquerades as a halachic imperative is shameful and disturbing.”

Cut them in half.

All I’ve seen of the film is the trailer — once — with the sound turned down. Based upon my extensive experience with the film, I’d label it as an affront to servicewomen — and all other women — and a statement that people in Hollywood think the American viewership are a shallow and stupid lot.

“Plebes of the world” are going to reelect Mr. Blatter.

That kilt thing is ill-designed and ill-fitting and you look great and remind me not to ever eat at that miserable place.

You deserve better than this, Victoria.

No coincidence: extra-large hydraulics.

Are we doing our armed forces a disservice showing all of this here and discussing it? Just asking.

I don’t know who can author on this blog, but this link might go well here:

1. Get a bigger garage.