Agreed and OH please. Gawker medias consistent and non hypocritical position on leaking information..

So Wikileaks was cool when they’re taking down Bush and the Republicans, but when they do the same to Clinton and the Democrats they’ve hit rock bottom?

The arguments have already been made, in the actual article and by other commenters; you’re just ignoring them for whatever reason. There are procedures for dealing with biased or otherwise compromised judges, and that attorney failed her client by not utilizing them.

Was this comment run through Google Translate?

I don't think anyone will be upset by this its just a good thing to do. Even if you see it as a waste of money it's not your money.

I never said she deserved it! Of course she doesn’t. Why does everyone assume that if you ask a question about a story, it means you’re blaming the victim or saying she deserved it? That’s fucked up.

You really think only a troll would question this?

The drone strike was authorized by a Democrat, so it didn’t have any negative side effects.

I think you’re in the wrong place. The BBC handles that end. This is where the mob gathers when facts go by the wayside.

Today I Learned: There are actually HIV Deniers...

*a Cayman Island one

“What’s the problem?”

Victim blaming, pure and simple.