In what world does the Saints D before the last 2 seasons qualify as anything but a massive detriment to your argument? Or the Bucs?
In what world does the Saints D before the last 2 seasons qualify as anything but a massive detriment to your argument? Or the Bucs?
You are a fucking psycho. Seek help.
The reason you see those arguments is because they’re valid arguments. Not only is Rodgers a better runner, he’s a better passer who had worse personnel around him (shown in the passer rating numbers). That doesn’t mean he had nothing, but you are fucking *high* if you think his receiving corps has been better than…
Give Rodgers Julio Jones and a playcaller who realizes that running the ball isn’t necessary like Ryan and I suspect things look a bit different. Note the attempts, plus Rodgers can run, Ryan cannot, and 10 points of passer rating is not exactly small.
Does the game of football consist of more than one phase of play that Rodgers isn’t a part of? Also, do they only play the playoffs?
Dude’s had mostly the same receiving corps for the last 6 years (pre-Jordy and Cobb injury strings), how do you reconcile that with your first couple paragraphs? Who, as a receiver, have they told to pound sand who ended up being really good?
Madison is great. Basically everywhere else is awful.
lol, there’s that delusion we all share.
Jordy was *much* better than you think.
Or if St Louis Cardinal fans were following a football team.
“I’ve never seen such a whiny, entitled bunch of fans in my life.”
I could probably do a 4 in hands on another person but no way I’m successfully doing anything else, even a half Windsor without redoing it at least 3 or 4 times.
Tying the tie is less surprising to me than shaving. I spent a good amount of time learning to tie a full Windsor after only being able to do a crappy four in hands for most of my adult life.
How does this qualify? Like 90+% of people who smoke can’t roll a joint.
It is fucking hilarious, and doesn’t reflect on anyone except himself. Unless, you know, you like to categorize an entire race based upon the actions of one person.
Literally no one is upset (except apparently you), everyone is laughing at it because it’s a ridiculous throwing motion in the movie.
I don’t think you need to be particularly adept at throwing when you look like that.
I see a lot of people missing a lot of points in this article. Also a lot of agendas informing opinion.
That literally has nothing to do with his joke.
The question was not “practical”, it was about “ugly”, and the Cube was the ugliest car ever. Boxes for cars are ugly by themselves, they managed to make it asymmetrical too.