I’m 34 and she’s right. Cutefied logos are NOT real.

Especially when the kerning in ‘Future Leader’ is so mad that I can’t read it as anything but Fut Ure Lea Der.

Yeah, it’s dumb. And it’s weird how much more gendered things are than they were when, say, I was a wee one in the 70s. I feel like we’ve lost ground in a lot of ways.

I always decided my non exist babies would wear whatever I deemed cute. Even if that means my boy would be wearing a purple and pink onesie.

Whyyyyyy are clothes for kids under the age of 9 or 10 (when bodies start to be different) or especially under the age of 3 or 4 (when kids can have their own opinions about what they wear) so terribly gendered?

I need a drink

;3 I got you.

Thank you.

False equivilancy. This killed AN ENTIRE HERD of reindeer at once. Wolves NEVER do that.

Oh shit, God just escalated the war on Christmas.

I’m not gonna pull them out of the greys, but hot damn, look at the comments in reply to mine. The idea of getting bent out of shape because I don’t like someone else’s writing blows my mind.

But there’s a serious difference between something like Halliburton stock and the charity. Stock means direct personal profit, while a charity doesn’t. No one’s ever really explained how the Clintons personally benefit from the foundation, beyond conspiracies and money laundering.

It seems like “I had nothing to do with that donation, also Congress, you write the budget, so why the fuck are you blaming me for this shit” would likely be a sufficient response.

All closing the foundation would do is prove to the right wing that they were right and it was corrupt. Meanwhile, a shit load of people would suffer and lots of good programs would stop.

FUCK NO.

The bad “optics” of this story is entirely of the media’s making.

I do not enjoy Hamilton Nolan’s hot takes and I wish he had been transferred to any other former Gawker-affiliated blog. In the future I will skip over his posts and/or become less likely to read DS for fear of seeing them.

There has been no concrete evidence of anything untoward actually happening so far. All the reporting has been about the appearance of scandal from implied implications of implications of implications. You’d think that if any media company had anything hard on them on this front it would be front page banner news. The…

Sure, it saves a few “lives” but it *appears* inappropriate!

Your article would be better with actual evidence to support your claims. As it is, it's just a hatchet job.