DID YOU READ ALEX’S ARTICLE FROM BEFORE THE ELECTION OR DID YOU JUST COME STRAIGHT TO THE COMMENTS TO SHIT POST? DOES YOUR ENTIRE WORLD VIEW REVOLVE AROUND DEFENDING BLOGGERS? ARE YOU SO AFRAID OF YOUR OWN SHADOW THAT YOU NEED TO JUMP IN AND DEFEND WHEN SOMEONE GETS CALLED OUT AFTER THEY CLAIMED THEY COULDN’T BE…

So did you ever decide whether to vote, or does your personal outrage end at the point you’re required to get up from your laptop?

$800 dollars and a free hotel is “cabfare” to you? Alright Scrooge McDuck, don’t you have a vault full of gold you need to swim in? Also, you can’t blame security for doing what they are told to do, being a security guard(part-time) at a bar myself.... I have a job to do. So when a bartender calls for me and says you…

Not sure why anyone would think this first given the current trend of using exactly this method in terror attacks.

If there indications that point that it’s a act of terror then there is nothing wrong with calling it what it is, him being the PM would make me believe he has some information that has not yet been released to the public, however having said that, I do agree with your overall point though. So even though he is the PM…

Driving vehicles in to crowds on purpose has been a pretty popular mode of terrorism as of late, so I don’t see this as an out there assumption really.

I realize the two are not equivalent, but they are related.

Generally I agree that it’s not cool to constantly denigrate women by routinely referring to them as bitches. This, however, is a textbook example of a bitch.

You watched the video and you’re going to defend her?

wait...what??

Yes, we will ignore it. She threatened to destroy his life, drag his reputation through the mud, drop a cloud of suspicion over him that would follow him forever. She wants to cost him time, money, opportunity, friends, family, and a future.

And he used some bad words. His cool slipped and out pops some naughty…

No. Just no. We get it, you’re a good person. It’s been noted. Move on.

You’re doing the same thing as when a republican remarks on the intolerant left. We are cussing this lady out because the did something cussworthy...Not “just because she is a woman”.

We don’t know what happened? Um it’s pretty clear that she lost her mind because he didn’t have a charger for her phone.....

He did more than that. He never called her a name to your face. He never reacted when she slapped the back of his seat or his car in general. He never reacted when she threatened his livelihood or fraudulent legal action. He is not a saint, but examining him harshly just on non-physical interaction takes away from his…

Yes. He was justifiably mad and she was precisely what he said.

Ignore?! What would you insinuate she was then?

Let’s put it this way: if I see a future thinkpiece about the “problematic” language of this guy, who had just gotten out of a massively stressful and threatening situation at the hands of an utter shitbag, I’ll have to tie my hands to the desk to keep myself from throwing a brick through my monitor.

Don’t care. Really, really don’t care in this instance. And, frankly, it seems silly to focus on that when the actual story is one person threatening to ruin another person’s livelihood, and making the problem of believing sexual assault victims more difficult in the process.

No, we’re not. We can talk about it.