It took me a while to catch on, but Amy Poehler's alarm went off at, I think, 7:15?, which at first made me think "It would be absolutely impossible to get across the country in two hours," and then made me think "…and she's on West Coast time, so it would be literally impossible without time travel."

They're bad about a lot of things. I only found out this was on Netflix today when it was "recommended." And all their auto-play / "jump to the next episode instead of showing the credits" settings that you can't turn off are infuriating. Maybe they should spend less money on Adam Sandler films and more on designing a…

Are any of these comments not discussing future episodes?

Weird how people react when you get regressive and personal.

It's fitting he thinks that, because as another commenter pointed out, everything he does is, in fact, a performance in that way.

Which two? Cherry and Keith or Bash and Florian?

Ratner?

Well, seasons 2 and 3 of Parks was the peak of the show, much like seasons 2 and 3 of The Office. But then both slid into contrivance; Parks' just being much more syrupy than The Office's.

Crazy Ex-Girlfriend had an entire musical number about this attitude.

It's too bad her name wasn't Barc Baron.

I definitely saw it as a bit of a, "good job making sure you worked crack in there, like we all talked about!"

Netflix: When you want to watch Alison Brie get an abortion in a sensitively handled, realistic manner.

Did Damone get a big redemption? It's been a long time since I've seen the film, but I remember him getting busted for scalping at the end. Seemed more comeuppance than anything.

On Netflix.

And he confronted her at her place of work, while she was in the middle of a performance. If he couldn't track her down anywhere else, he could at least have waited outside until it was over.

Andy was so much better as a character as a weird, annoying suck-up/asshole than an aw-shucks-I-never-got-my-dad's-approval guy.

No, you're still wrong, "winning" isn't a character trait, and I find your interpretation of the Walter / Skyler relationship bizarre, but since you keep repeating the same points, I don't see myself getting through here. You do you.

"Heroism" isn't about winning, it's about courage, sacrifice, nobility, doing the right thing, etc., and Walter can't really ever be said to be doing the right thing, at least not after about episode four or so. And lack of heroic qualities isn't in and of itself "antiheroism," or every villain would be an antihero.

What they often call an antihero is just an amoral winner.

I must be getting older, because nothing annoys me so much as the fifteen-year-old's logic of "You don't feel the way I feel about this, maybe you should watch something brain-dead and trite instead."