ruckcohlchez--disqus
Ruck Cohlchez ?
ruckcohlchez--disqus

This very much reminds me of the Mr. Show grocery store wars sketch.

"F" was too high a grade for that episode. The episode was plenty terrible in and of itself, but when you consider how much potential and goodwill the show squandered, it becomes an affront to the idea of televisual art.

Have you ever written an actual English sentence?

Well, if there's some explanation for why Hank left early, or it turns out to be a key plot point (i.e. he slipped up because of the head injury and that leads to other consequences with Peggy, Dodd, or whoever) that would be acceptable— good, even. But like the reviewer, it was a noticeable gap to me, because

I remember having fun brainstorming answers to that question around this time (12-15 years ago, I would guess?) My favorite idea was "What Would You Screw?", where contestants receive increasing amounts of money to copulate with increasingly unsavory and unpleasant objects. Frankly, I'm still surprised nothing like

Based on how many episodes seem to be seasonal or holiday themed based on when they aired, I've been taking last season as Spring 1995, this season (so far) as Fall 1995, etc.

As someone who has played enough fantasy football to start thinking about whether or not it's taking up too much time in his life, it's the "lame, unfunny, and vulgar" one.

With the exception of Steve Razzamatazz, the main cast has moved on to other things besides this show after seven years.

What an apt summary of why I never really liked this show. "It's a hangout sitcom, but with people you don't want to hang out with!"

Eh, I don't think it's that tiny; it's a plot hole without explanation. The thing is, there is a perfectly good explanation some commenters fanwaved away (by the time Ted Danson woke up, Peggy had already left). It wouldn't have been that hard to clarify that in a few seconds on screen, so that falls on the writer and

What a bizarre headline for a story about giving the showrunner a contract extension.

It is 1995. For some reason the reviewer said 1997 a few weeks ago and it's stuck.

You know, I know grades don't matter, but it's still weird to read a review wherein the first half is spent complaining (justifiably) about a plot hole, and then the episode gets an A anyway.

Let me guess: the ad ran 50% longer than its allotted space and contained a lot of stupid, over-the-top violence.

Fatt Damon

Have you seen John Goodman lately? He's lost a TON of weight.

"What's that? You want me to drink you? But I'm in the middle of a trial!"

An inexplicable number of MattressFirms have popped up in my neighborhood recently. There's like three-now within a one-mile radius (plus a couple MattressPros).

Shut up, egghead!

The Golden Years were jam-packed with references, but they weren't contemporary trends— they were usually works that had stood the test of time, or the references were to something very peculiar and specific that spoke to a character ("You call this Postum?!")