Where can you see those? They usually don't air with the broadcast (or Comedy Central squishes them to fit in the credits from the next show).

You might say Jerry and Beth's relationship is… co-Dean-pendent.

Showing one's ass is a sign of submission across many species.

Me too. I recognized it immediately, which made it so much funnier.

I wasn't sure about that, but I did take note that after Toby Matthews told her "cool top" at the party, she was wearing the same one to school the next day.

NnnnnnnOOOOoooooo!

To be fair, one of the creators of this show wrote Heat Vision and Jack, so @jayblanc:disqus is right; there's no way Dan Harmon wouldn't know that.

What I gathered is, they're supposed to serve as metaphors for how negative conceptions of a partner can manifest themselves in real-life dysfunctions and conflict— showing that if either of them were actually as terrible as the other one thought, the other one would be dead by now (which we saw happen at least once).

Yeah, that's fair, and I liked the first one. But I immediately became suspicious of anyone who celebrated their entire catalog and thought it was super cool and/or hilarious.

I've always been suspicious of anyone who really loves Cake (or Weezer) because they strike me as Peak Gen-X Irony.

"Wizards under the sheets" is an all-time great line. EWE was (is!) in no short supply of those.

The gist of the argument is that feminist criticism is one lens through which a film can be viewed, and crucially that problems a film has related to feminism need not be cause for condemnation and summary dismissal of the film as a whole.

Well, I hate fades because I hate one-option plays that rely on incredible timing and accuracy, but your point is well taken, since that also applies, more or less, to the quick slant here (with the added bonus of the increased likelihood of a turnover). On the other hand, quick slant was always my most reliable play…

http://pbfcomics.com/20/

Tony Romo pulling out the last-second victory but still losing Dez Bryant makes me think for some reason of "Petty Cash."

Yeah, the Super Bowl play call I didn't mind as much in a vacuum, but there is definitely something to be said for the "go to your best players in critical moments" mindset. If Seattle's receivers weren't a collection of undrafted free agents, maybe the play would work (after all, the receiver basically failed to box…

Romo can gloat over Jason Pierre-Paul('s hand) being blown up.

Yeah, I think even the announcer said the Rams were prepared. I'd just kick it deep in any situation the other team seems prepared for it (except the obvious late-game "giving up possession means we lose" scenarios).

The Giants now have two TDs that came directly out of the hands of Cowboys receivers (the second return was ruled down at the 1, but I'm still counting it).

The element of surprise is a major factor. Studies show that "surprise" onside kicks (unexpected situations / kicks lined up like normal) succeed about 50% of the time, whereas "conventional" onside kicks (obvious situations where the receiving team is prepared for it) succeed between 10-20%.