Okay, I agree, "sexhausted" was an obnoxious wordplay on a serious crime. There are a lot of things on this website that are shitty. For instance, it's not very intersectional, and takes a very white woman-only perspective on feminism in a number of articles. But that's literally one article. The rest of those are…

LOL YES POWERFUL FEMINIST CONSPIRACY. We just want all the rape for ourselves, obviously. One wonders if we're so powerful and capable of pulling the strings in the media and shifting culture and disguising statistics so easily, why we don't put more women in positions of power, or why there's no Wonder Woman movie…

Also, asking if Jezebel covers men's issues is like showing up to a fucking NAACP meeting and asking why they don't spend more time defending white people. This is a feminist website, you moron.

None of those articles are about male rape?

First of all, you haven't even MADE your point, because I don't see the evidence that men are being killed in droves for being suspected rapists. I do see evidence of women being constantly blamed for their own rapes, and men being given light sentences and news reporters crying over how their lives have been ruined…

And women are systematically murdered, beaten and raped every single day, all over the world. Your point?

First of all, yes, it is, shithead. Second, punch yourself in the face.

No one is interested in your MRA bullshit. Go dig a fucking hole.

Seriously, you are straight-up next-level delusional if you actually believe that.

Just ten fucking seconds ago, with your "it's just a joke" bullshit.

Can you just get the fuck off of Jezebel, you creepy rape apologist?

And rapists and future, potential rapists who HEAR stupid chants about rape are comforted in the idea that their culture supports their crime. So, yeah, it's still a big deal.

Okay, that's fine, except it has absolutely nothing to do with this article whatsoever, so you are just stirring up shit by posting about it here, and you know it. Find another place to talk about this, if you really desperately need to. The comment section of an article about the rape of a fourteen year old child is…

Peer-reviewed studies about WHAT. You haven't even articulated what in the hell you are talking about, except that it's definitely not about rape.

"In a way more positive direction on the behavior spectrum" and "all sorts of social situations" are both phrases that mean absolutely nothing in the complete absence of context that you've used them in.

There's "no work being done" in this area because what you're asking is a STUPID QUESTION. Which you've been told repeatedly. Which you are ignoring because you really, really, really want this to be a thing.

Guys! He was just asking a completely irrelevant question about "sex appeal" in abuse and power dynamics in a thread about the rape of a fourteen year old! Why would you assume his comment had anything to do with the article he was commenting on? Crazy emotional women.

No, you moron.

Unless you're saying that people only qualify as human if they agree with you, which is probably closer to what you really feel.

Umm, no. "Human beings" haven't determined that. Corporations have. The fact that we're having this argument is proof that human beings haven't "determined" anything.