The new crossover Pathfinder?

Yes or no?

Go on Google. Type “car cr0ss-section”.

Weight matters not when it comes to supercar top speeds. It’s nearly all a function of HP and aero.

Denise Milani.

Yep.

It’s becoming increasingly difficult to tell the C-Class, E-Class, and S-Class apart, especially from the rear. For the record, I think the styling looks good, just maybe too similar across the range.

They likely put it in to make it appear longer and less upright/tall.

That’s perfect.

But muh clickbait headline!

Uhh....Lower Wacker Drive at midnight?

Purism is boring.

You can give them a nice stance (I’m not talking about stupid slammedhellacamber stance) with some easy modification. The easy way is adjusting the torsion bars with a ratchet wrench, or you can pull them out and adjust them that way (which is a bit better for ride quality).

The T-80 had a new 1000hp engine, and was faster than the 700hp T-64.

Would love to see that blog!

Almost all since the T-64 do. They wanted to keep their turrets (as well as the rest of the tank) fairly small and lightweight, and figured they could do this by eliminating one of the crew positions (loader), with the added bonus of only requiring three men per tank.

“T-72 was the “replacement” of T-64. Not complementary.”

That may be true. I do not know the current condition or upgrades present on the old Ukrainian armor.

The T-64 is actually higher in the tank hierarchy than the T-72 is...it contained more advanced technology and was more expensive to produce.

Yeah, but they really should’ve used the GT350 engine (perhaps with twin turbo “EcoBoost”). That would have been the tops.