1000hp!? In THIS economy???
1000hp!? In THIS economy???
We have a 2018. Absolutely hilarious to hear single 22 year olds e36 M3 owners talk about how shitty of a car this is.
“There’s a very bug difference between running a gasoline car without a cat and what these dumb asses were doing.”
Who is this car for you ask? It’s for me. The dude who owned an e36 M3, e46 M3, mz4, mz3, audi RS4, and an e92 M3 in the past.
Really an article on a faulty check light that occurred during a test flight?
The public has phrased this “Boeing cheaped out by adapting the 737NG type to the 737MAX instead of paying to invest in a new airframe” that’s just not the reality of what happened.
Literally none of that is true. Just because you can type something on the internet doesn’t make it fact.
I’ll let you in on a little secret that Jalop’ers won’t like to hear at all. The MT is dying off because it’s an inferior piece of equipment to modern DCT & 8-spd autos; and rightly so. It’s the cassette player in an age of streaming music; and just like tapes you will always have a small, but extremely vocal subset…
I am sorry but that is incorrect.
That is not true despite being reported (inaccurately) in many major newspapers.
None of that is true.
Yeah none of that is true.
They did attempt to execute the procedure outlined in the airworthiness directive but didn’t fully execute the “runaway trim” procedure because they didn’t reduce throttle. Plane was at max airspeed the entire time they were attempting to correct. At higher speed the force on the stabilizer is more than the manual…
* some pilots.
What you’ve typed there is not true.
MCAS fix from Boeing’s website:
That jet is intended as a replacement for the 757 not the 737.
MCAS isn’t anti stall. It’s intent was, in the event of a stall, the MAX would handle exactly like previous 737's had in the same scenario.
From Boeing’s Website:
That is not true.