Fair point to make, but the content of the message, while ironic, isn’t really the problem I might have with this, but rather the growing centralization of media voices by conservative megacorps. This is a spectacular example of editorial control by a company that at best is crassly commercial and restricts local…

Just because this singular statement that Sinclair forced its broadcasters to record and air “does not sink to the level of propaganda” does not mean that it is not, by and large, a statement to let slide the constant propaganda that Sinclair forces on networks it owns.
It normalizes a stance against other news…

I figure that the average demographic that still actually watches local news, as opposed to getting their information online, also watches Fox anyway.

Is QLED simply a way to simulate OLED on the cheap?

Is QLED simply a way to simulate OLED on the cheap?

No, absolutely not. QLED is a way for Samsung to build cheaper TVs (and I’m a Samsung fan, so this is not me bashing them because I like a different brand) and sell it for OLED prices because consumers are ignorant. QLED is marginally better than typical LCD, but utter trash in comparison to a good OLED set.

No, absolutely not. QLED is a way for Samsung to build cheaper TVs (and I’m a Samsung fan, so this is not me bashing…

Alright so I can add something here. I don’t wanna sell it as the juiciest thing, but:

Personally thats why i like the GTI. It has a smaller turbo meaning less lag and it makes more torque down low and its lighter. yes its FWD but really so is the Golf R most of the time you are driving it due to haldex. the GTI is significantly lighter, and you get a larger bang for buck tuning wise. Stage II R gets…

Should have bought an RS3 for that price.

Your mom sounds like a pretty cool lady!

Put a Formula E type wing with 4 main elements but overall much simpler and you have a car that can actually approach others from behind and draft with minimal effect and not totally burn off anything existing. Mandate the number of elements to a maximum. Less complexity means more robustness due to dirty air.

You have been misinformed.

except if you get in a accident or happen to roll the new Wrangler you’ll actually survive.

To be faaaaaair...it is a car you can pee in.

Yeah, lets ban things we don’t like! We don’t need sports cars either because no one needs that kind of speed or power. Same goes for ATVs, jetskis, etc.

Agreed in full. Author has a stick up his butt.

That’s usually due to the owners... most decent RV’s are capable of doing 80+ without too much trouble. Just like how a Prius can do 100+ but you’ll never see it doing that due to the owners.

Absolutely true. However the percentage of time the tow vehicle will actually have trailer hooked to it and causing it to get extremely poor fuel economy is relatively small.

I got 6 MPG with my 27' 1977 Vogue. 440 Chrysler

They’re basically busses, so like 7-10mpg. The tow-behind ones probably decrease a truck’s mpg to about 12-14. So, not as bad as you said, but still pretty bad.