Since the share the same mental illness, you'd think they could get along.

Used clothes?

Psst. She wasn't told to leave the store, she was asked to put her dog in a cart.

Yeah, if only it was legit and not horseshit propaganda. Then it would really drive home the point.

Hmm. Support a democratic nation or support a militant terrorist organization.

Eh, maybe I'm just too cynical, but everything is marketed with big lies and I see this as one more example, no more or less noteworthy than the rest.

True, but 'shady' wouldn't necessarily drive away potential readers.

Kinda like the guy who rented a house next door to Sarah Palin so he could write an unauthorized biography. At least he was open about it. But then I'd bet his book has more 'mistruths' in it that this one.

I would assume it's all accurate unless the sisters were telling tall tales. And as for the pitch, she could market it as, "the completely unauthorized story" or "the book Harper Lee doesn't want you to read" and it would probably sell more than it would have otherwise. :-)

If she's really that bad, Mills can always find a job writing titles for Gawker.

What's important is not whether it's authorized and welcome, but whether it's accurate and truthful.

When I go for a trim, I'm literally in and out in 10 minutes.

What the kids did wasn't endangerment, it was undangerment.

When God decides he wants a dog, nothing stands in his way.

No point, I'm just killing time.

I think you're confusing a snarky response and caring.

Another classic demonstration that enthusiasts just don't understand electric vehicles.

Wow, what a misleading headline. I was all ready to be angry with the store manager. But it turns out she's not really a bombing survivor, just the daughter of a survivor, and she wasn't kicked out of the store, she was just asked to put her dog in a cart and she got all pissy.

Yeah, that one works if your rest room is only for men with tent pole erections.

He does have a point though. Many practices that are commonplace today were previously forbidden and unheard of. Not saying he's right, just saying only the future can tell if he's right.