That’s a strange logic. Should we do away with a principle, simply b/c some fail to adhere to it all the time? Do you understand what burdening the defendant with the proof of innocence would actually mean? Just take a look at totalitarian countries like China, where authorities can accuse every citizen about…

The burden of proof is put upon the victim and there’s often a bias toward innocence, which can make the entire process feel futile and even cruel.

The guy going through that Super Mutant den is a monster. How can he leave so much stuff untaken. He unlocked a safe at one point and didn’t even look what was inside. MADNESS!!!

One of my most vivid memories of The Witcher 3 is a part of the story where you have to escape a certain place, and this dude is in your way. You’ve been kind of in a mixed relationship with the dude the entire game (and some of the previous games iirc) and right there he wants to stop you from leaving. You get 2…

This is another issue with the conversation I’m afraid will affect my enjoyment. In the previous games you knew exactly what you were saying and the NPC responded accordingly.

I liked knowing exactly what was going to be said beforehand. In the older games, your dialogue options could get pretty complex, too.

Yeah, but a ship is named different from before, so stuff is awkward now, you know.

Good fucking gravy. This article exemplifies every irksome quality that plagues modern nerddom. Younger generations are leaving organized religion in droves and I have no desire to see them replicate the church experience through secular pop-culture. I enjoy a good pedantic argument now and then, but please save the…