Wait, is this actually true? How can the same people who demonised Clinton for “emails” possibly be okay with that?
Wait, is this actually true? How can the same people who demonised Clinton for “emails” possibly be okay with that?
Good job Bill wasn’t running then.
Right, but you brought her up out of nowhere as a counter to someone complaining about Trump. You made this conversation about Clinton compared to Trump. Maybe you weren’t defending him, but what did you expect?
Yes, he should be charged. But your argument seems to forget that it might not be so easy to fight back against someone that powerful and influential. If this man can decide whether or not you still have a job the next day, is it so easy to just “resist”, as you put it?
I think it’s fully fair to judge him by today’s standards. It’s not as if he jumped from the 50's to now via time machine or spent all that time in a cabin in the woods with no human contact.
Indeed. Only a true idiot simply rejects information. It doesn’t matter if you think you already know something, you can never know what you don’t know so how can you know that there’s no more you need to know?