rosaluxembourgsbirkin
RosaLuxembourgsBirkin
rosaluxembourgsbirkin

Ha, once again you avoid your original statement. Pure gold. Sorry, I mean pure-gold.

Since you started with a vague and non-sensical comment about “corporate media” and then made no attempt to try and clarify your thoughts after others have replied to you I think it’s safe to say nobody knows what you are talking about. Including you.

So you’re saying the problem is that the Obama Administration leaked this to NBC (i.e. corporate media), because if they had leaked it to PBS or BBC (i.e. state media) - or hell, even WikiLeaks themselves - then everything would be A.O.K.

If your model is predicated upon the maintenance of a largely homogeneous society in an increasingly diverse world, then yes, that model is broken and we should not use it.

You miss my point. The point is not “acclimatization.” The point is racism. The rate of employment is not merely refugees, it’s immigrants in total. And it’s true: Sweden has a serious problem with its people refusing to hire non-Swedes. The UN has documented it as being among the worst nations in the world for

[re: whether or not profiting from an unethical system is unethical]:

Nothing about progressivism involves the spread of “independent contractor” app-based jobs. He’s completely abusing the term. The vast majority of progressives are in favor of unions and full-time work with benefits, not this technocratic utopia crap. This is libertarianism, pure and simple.

Also:

Oh fuck off with that “victim blaming” bullshit. These guys willingly and purposefully had unprotected sex with a stranger and are now making their own responsibility into a criminal charge. What would you say about a woman who had unprotected sex with a guy then wanted him to go to prison because he didn’t warn her

Right so then the most you can say is you and your friends didn’t vote for Trump full stop. The rural redneck thing did not bear out as an absolute either, 50% of Trump voters had income greater than 70k a year, which is not surprising being that a lot were also college educated. Your problem is that you think because

What I am saying is what you and OP see as a “sizeable” difference that somehow deems that 53% which represents flesh and blood people as neglible or not noteworthy is bull sheet. Cause For Me the fact that about 80 mil white men wanted Trump as President does not vastly overshadow the 70 mil white women who also did.

I feel like the victims assumed he was HIV Negative. Perhaps Johnson assumed that anyone willing to have an unprotected sex with a hookup from Grndr was on PREP. Just a bunch of bad decisions all around

The problem is that I’d take you far more seriously if you actually had a decent grasp of the current laws on HIV criminal transmission, but your comments make pretty clear that you do not. And since I do, why are you bothering to lecture me on a subject you are clearly not well-versed in? I’m sorry you picked a fight

If you are going to comment, please read up on the laws first.

Except...no. Deserving something means that you get what is right and should happen to you. Again, show me where I said that it is right that somebody gets HIV.

If that 10% (with an exclamation point no less) helps sooth your cognitive dissonance, go ahead. But facts are facts, and in fact both white men AND women are responsible. There are many articles even on this site to clarify this for you, perhaps a map as well (see above though it is pre-election, and note the states.

Show me where I said that.

You mean, without white men, the 53% of white women voting for Trump would have magically disappeared? The majority of people who share the same race and gender with Hillary Clinton chose not to vote for her, but hey let’s not mention this irrelevant little tidbit!

I mean, that’s such a nonsensical statement that it doesn’t even deserve to be deconstructed for the nonsense that it is. Either you are obstinately trolling or have no understanding of business.