Not even a pick will save me. I've got a mix of waves in there, so I just look like a show poodle had a beauty disaster naturally. If you care about hair typing at all, I've successfully managed to have 2C to 3C in different spots.

The gay agenda appreciates your efforts. ;)

Same here! It took me over ten years to learn how to fix my curly hair. if someone tries to cut my hair wet now, I just know to bounce.

Makes sense. I think it's tempting to think wounding would be better, but I see your point now. I hadn’t thought about it before, but in police situations where some people feel you should shoot to incapacitate, you would have a lower burden of proof to justify shooting. However, you would still run the risk of…

This! I'm so afraid so getting 90s brows or looking permanently surprised that I don't know what to do with my besides plucking stray hairs.

Agreed on no guns at rallies. Even in the hypothetical worst case, we need a good guy with a gun situation, it would be too dangerous to shoot.

Of course now we know only one side is an asshole in this, but I agree. You would have seen a different response had someone been shot and we're lucky no one was, but my first response was with regards to the only person that was hurt.

To use your example and my thinking based on available information at the time: if two people shot a gun in a place they weren’t supposed to, one in an isolated area and one in a crowded area and the person in an isolated area hit someone and then ran away, yes, I would have more of a problem with the isolated person.

Nope. Someone who is the driver in a hit and run is worse than someone who doesn’t actually injure anyone. This doesnt appear to be the case now since hit and run doesn't typically mean find nearest place to call police, but was appeared to be true as of the time I made my comment. You are welcome to take your false…

Hit and run doesn’t typically mean go to nearest safe spot to pull over and find a police officer and explain, and almost all the articles the morning are still using hit and run in the title as well as burying that they know who the driver is at the bottom of the page. This article should be boosted higher.

Insane. As an average person, I’d be much more likely to believe “I was trying to stop him so I shot tried to shoot out his tires” than “ i wa trying to stop him so I thought I’d shoot him dead in the street.”

I didn’t know that! Awesome! It seems like a lot of the time police kind of shrug at you if your car is stolen. (Not that I blame them, because there’s not a lot you can do until someone calls in an abandoned vehicle or someone catches them in it.)

Also, since I apparently read right passt the middle of your comment, the relative ability to catch the criminal explains why I expressed hope that the driver would be caught, not why I think he's the bigger asshole.

I agree with this ruling. Looney is the clear champion of gif game.

Both this article and the linked ap article imply intent, so its not unreasonable for me to think so. Besides, someone who hits a person and leaves them there even accidentally isn’t too far from being a murderer in my mind. As I said before, it seems obvious to me that the shooter would be caught, and much less…

If the shooter’s lawyer has one ounce of sense, he will use good guy with a gun in his defense. Of course I'll still think it's bull because don't shoot people. We have a court system for a reason and vigilante justice is shameful. But apparently a whole bunch of people disagree because we keep letting shits like…

This is true. Too many people with shitty judgment have guns in this country. Even if you boil it down to self interest, time spent shooting your gun could be better used memorizing the license plate of the person who hit the protestor.

I thought of this as well, but I'll hope road rage or maybe even cowardly hit and runner until there's more info.

The driver actually did hurt someone instead of could have hurt someone, so is the bigger asshole in the nonzero sum of terrible people. Besides, the shooter seems more easily identifiable given that I can’t imagine he or she would have shot at someone over a stranger. Barring a super visible license plate on a…

That person as well. The person who actually injured someone was the bigger asshole in my mind. I fully expect that the shooter will be caught and will claim he was trying to shoot out tires or try to invoke some variation of stand your ground and it will be bullshit to highest order.