roots4x
roots4x
roots4x

Wouldn't that be intentionally hilarious?

yes

Your hypothesis doesn't make sense. The companies that produce SSDs are not the same companies that produce hard drives (except briefly for Samsung). The first players in the SSD market were Intel, Samsung, Micron, OCZ, Crucial. Only now is Seagate getting into the market. AFAIK Western Digital has no SSDs or maybe

Unless you can find evidence to the contrary, nothing has been reported to suggest that this train relied on any automatic system of speed control.

Are you implying that this train was autonomous? I don't think it was.

It's probably cheaper to have one antenna and entertainment unit than it would be to have two different units. A small part of the upgrade module is probably for IP and licensing but let's be honest, it's mostly just the options charge. Personally I think it's great that someone can buy one of these cars used and

The C-class and S-class have always looked very similar. Virtually all car manufacturers do this or have done this at some point. It's nothing new.

Yeah, I'd rather be tall and be uncomfortable on a plane than be short.

Saying Ford's system is garbage based on this test is kinda unfair. Sure Subaru can send more power to ONE wheel but how likely is it that you're going to be stuck on an incline like that with 3 out of 4 wheels slipping with ZERO traction? Oh, and for half of those cars, if the one good wheel was up front, they

I can guarantee a RWD with winter tires would beat a comparable FWD car with all-seasons in all possible safety and performance metrics.

An extra set of winter tires are 100% necessary if you drive on sport summer tires. Summer tires provide dangerously low levels of grip on any slightly icy or snowy surface in freezing temperatures. It's just not worth it to gamble.

I guess some municipality would have to prove that he was speeding across their roads otherwise it'd be hard to nail him for anything.

Oh he's part Asian, it's totally cool.

Also, you say that suing based on something you caused should not be a "sue-able offense." That's simply not true. If a product is "defective" and it causes more harm than would normally be expected, then the manufacturer of this defective product can be found liable. No one expects to get third degree burns from

The point of the lawsuit was that the coffee served was dangerously hot. Normally hot coffee would indeed burn, but wouldn't cause 3rd degree burns. No one is contesting the seriousness of the injuries. No one is contesting the coffee was dangerously hot. No one is contesting that the woman shouldn't have had the

Dude, $50/8 = $6.25 an hour. Add that to $1.50 and you get:

She was NOT driving.

I'll preface by saying that my personal opinion of this case doesn't matter. We have no idea what actually happened and the jury must have had more information than this blog post reveals. That said, I think that the old person mixed up the pedals. However, we can't dismiss this. You know why? Because any lawyer or

I had a totally different experience from you. I never used those early Android phones, but jumping from the iPhone 4's laggy slow iOS6 experience to a Galaxy S4 was pretty much exactly the opposite of the experience you had. Feature-wise, Android blows iOS6 (and iOS7) out of the water. Some things I miss about iOS

More like Ninja Turtle smile.