rokness275
Rokness275
rokness275

I wholly disagree. I think you’re on the right track but what is defunding or abolishing going to do? Do you have a plan, then, to fill that void? Otherwise you’re just removing the ability to stop crime as it’s happening (as you say that’s the only thing they can do), which is fucking horrible. Yes, it’s shitty that

it’s sad that you include assault as part of your definition of reproach; you’d make a very good advisor to Trump, Putin or anyone else of their ilk

Rich and famous people learn about what the world thinks of them by hearing what that world says about them. You wanna know why Will Smith hasn’t made much of a peep over the last few weeks? So he doesn’t make any more of a complete fool of himself, and the world can forget about him for a little while.

The point was not and should not ever be whether or not anyone’s jokes were funny. That non-point shouldn’t even be part of the conversation. The point is grown adults should not hit each other to air their grievances. Not on television, not off television, not fucking anywhere. Children often hit each other because

This is a garbage take.

There was no evidence of an iconoclast in any episode either.

Buffet is by all accounts honest and upright, he actually advocates raising taxes on the rich. The worst thing you could find out about him was his paraphrasing Ben Franklin. If that’s your idea of a problematic man you need to take look at your standards.

The throwing in that we’re all racist because we a concerned about this was a hell of a curve.

It’s like this was written by someone with absolutely zero knowledge

I don’t mean to be snide, really, but you were looking for an analysis of geopolitics on Jez? Try Foreign Policy, The Washington Post, The New York Times, The Christian Science Monitor (a very good and fairly neutral newspaper with only one page devoted to religious news), or the BBC.  My faves are the Wash Post and

Not a great look to imply that people care about this war more because it involves white people, while referring to a war “in” Boko Haram.

Not that I expect brilliant international relations analysis from Jezebel, but I have to love how for all the complaining about imperialism, this is the most America-centric analysis of Ukraine I have ever seen. There isn’t even a mention of Europe, their over reliance on Russian gas (especially Germany), NATO,

This is like asking why we care so much about hackers in a video game since its all just for funsies anyway. In the spirit of fair competition, which sports should be based on, its important to note and evaluate any unfair advantage.

Are these republicans taking it too far? Absolutely. But this didn’t come from

We’re not talking a trans person here. We’re talking about a hypothetical future where there are no gendered divisions in sports so some dude can just be some dude who identifies as some dude who decides to try out for a WNBA team.

“Kramer, you’re beating up kids!” “No Jerry, we’re all at the same skill level!”

Unless you’re being tongue in cheek (I can’t tell on this site anymore) The standard you’re advocating for is silly. No one wants to watch some dude who would have been a bench warmer for the Washington Generals score 50 PPG in the WNBA, that’s dumb.

Sure, and while we’re at it... let’s get rid of age restrictions too! If kids and seniors want to compete, they’ll have to earn a place on the bench with the rest of the pros.

“So...he’s available?”

Motherfucker has $20 million+ in the bank from tossing a football around. He’s a household name. And he thinks he’s a slave for actively choosing to do this?

LOL. That reply ain’t coming.