roedygreen--disqus
roedygreen
roedygreen--disqus

If his victims had complained in a timely way, he was "in plain site". The police would have had not had any trouble finding him. There i no excuse for the delay.

1999 is far too late. The way it is now, the law encourages dawdling, both by the courts and by the complainants. For an accurate trial, the complainants should come forward immediately and the trial should be scheduled immediately. There are three more downsides to dawdling: 1. the perp will molest even more

It is ridiculous to have a trial about events that happened 50 years earlier.Think back 50 years. You just have a few snapshot memories that could easily have been warped by time. The accused and the accusers have no proper memory of what happened. We need measures to encourage speedy trials, preferably within