yeah but baylor beat tcu and msu beat baylor and osu beat msu and vt beat osu. WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN?! this same gripe happens every year from every fan. Please fuck off.

I agree, definitely darker purple on the set I always played. Also, there was an actual "$" in front of all the values instead of what's on this one, which looks like some special monopoly money sign. No sir, I don't like it.

when did they make those browns? am I crazy or did those use to be purple?

Rodgers, on the other hand, was suspended one game for sexual harassment.

Lost sucks. You're welcome for saving you that 100+ hours of your time.

Shut up. It isn't about you, you attention-seeking whore.

Excellent piece. It's still mind-boggling that State Farm hired Schneider to be its pitch-person when there were two-year-old comments like that out there and easily findable in even a half-assed, cursory due diligence check into Schneider's public comments.

1991. Boyz n the Hood.

I think they should stop screening blood altogether, because that's discrimination and discrimination is wrong

Needlessly catching HIV or AIDS from a blood transfusion doesn't make sense, so it's better to be safe than sorry. Gay men are much more likely to have HIV or AIDS than the general population, so prohibiting them from donating blood is just common sense.

There is almost zero chance of contracting HIV from a transfusion in the U.S.

I don't understand why this is on gizmodo and not gawker?

Exactly. Gay men are 3-5% of the population but they account for 60% of the HIV/AIDS population. It's not discrimination, it's just math.

I am totally for equal rights in every case where there are actually rights involved, but this is not really one of those cases. I know, many gay men are in long-term, monogamous relationships, and would be even less risk to the blood supply than a highly promiscuous straight man. There is a statistical risk, however.

How is this article related to news about gadgets and technology?

It's probably not based on assumptions about lives at all. It's probably based on a heartless actuarial table.

We all want to sound pissed about this because being so extremely pro gay everything is so totally in right now, but this is the opinion of 17 professional scientists who are frankly quite a bit smarter than any of us on the issue. I doubt it's a homophobic bias, really. If they want to be better safe than sorry, let…

I'm a Haematologist, so full disclosure. The reason is that any laboratory test has an inborn error rate, that is unavoidable in any test (balance of false positives and false negatives). Just imagine how many tests are done annually in the USA, how many donors. Then imagine people donating several times a year. In…

Respectfully, you don't know what the fuck you are talking about.

Maybe Comcast should be broken up.