And if you want to go topical, the game ends when Puerto Rico files bankruptcy.

And if you want to go topical, the game ends when Puerto Rico files bankruptcy.

Are you kidding me? Am I reading this correctly? Did you just call the slime that the WSJ produces “work”? After their absurd hit-pieces? That’s a bold claim, and one that over seventeen million people seem to disagree with.

Like to note that literally none of these YouTubers are racist. And there’s very clearly an agenda going on between the WSJ and big YouTubers, though the endgame may not be shutting down YouTube revenue.

to be fair wsj did blow this whole thing out of proportion, while the video was horrid and they technically did “make money” (doubtfull when you take into the time and equipment cost) they made a measily 12$. wsj made it out like the people making these vids are making a buttload of money or something. it was a non…

Are we talking about the same Wall Street Journal that sold the Iraq war?

I know Chuck Berry is up there in heaven smiling down on all of us and pleasuring himself everytime a woman uses the bathroom.

Johnny Pee Good.

You some kind of holocaust hipster? Did you like it before it was mainstream?

I’m sure you would shut them down too with claims of “offensiveness” in any context.

Oh please. Three days on the internet is enough to know no one uses swastikas seriously. You are literally being Oprah going on about the “9000 penises” bit.

The simple fact is that the Wall Street Journal is suffering the same fate of most print media, collapsing revenues in the face of a public that no longer wants to pay for the opinions of a random individual when they can simply watch another random individual express their opinions on Youtube or Facebook for free.

SENPAI NOTICED ME

(är′bĭ-tər)

The problem here isn’t inciting violence against real actual “classic” Nazis. The problem is that the word nazi, little n, is being expanded to mean almost anything you don’t agree with.

I’d advocate punching a “classic” Nazi all day long.

But claiming something is like a nazi to justify violence is obviously a bad…

I’d rather normalize hate speech than assault.

You make this post a lot in a variety of articles. Just because one of the bloggers made you “black” because they liked a couple of your comments does not in any way make you more important than a “grey.”

Right, and what happens when people get labeled nazis that aren’t nazis, and thus are made acceptable targets for violence? Like a girl wearing a “make America bitcoin again” hat, for example? What happens when the people espousing violence against non nazis start getting shot?

Bullshit.

Uh huh. And you’ll just be shocked and stunned when the definition of “Nazi” starts to shift. “Gosh, well if the Alt-Right are Nazis, then surely the regular Right are too...”

So... does that mean we can punch Commie’s too?