robusto68
Robusto68
robusto68

This is the deal with the DNC the Clinton campaign had.

Not even close to being comparable. Your response to the the claim that one candidate cheated is to essentially say “Oh yeah, well the other candidate was in the race too!”

Did you read the agreement the DNC made with Clinton? She controlled the party. There’s no comparison.

Really? It sounds crazy I know, especially in America the shining city on the hill, but dang it if sometimes it seems we have some racism here! I keep being told we’re a post-racial society, so maybe I’m misunderstanding something.

So what your saying is given similar choices (not actually true) Hillary chose to take advantage of the system, Bernie did not. Got it.

I’m no expert in labor law but I could have sworn closing a business to prevent unionization was illegal.

I was friends with someone who was a PA for a C-list’r and I know for a fact that a lot of celebrity gossip comes from other celebrities who trade for better coverage.

At the end of the day, even though Hillary probably would have beaten Bernie without cheating, the cheating helps identify why so many people disliked her in the first place, which among many other things help her lose to Trump.

You said Obama did the same thing in 2008. That’s not true. Hillary took over the party before she won the primaries. Obama took over after he won the primaries.

Obama took over the party when he won. Not before he won.

It’s in the article.

That doesn’t mean the Hillary campaign should have been given control of the party.

That doesn’t mean the Hillary campaign should have been given control of the party.

That doesn’t mean the Hillary campaign should have been given control of the party.

That doesn’t mean the Hillary campaign should have been given control of the party.

Thor:R resolves how Thor 2 ended, so it probably wouldn’t hurt but it probably doesn’t matter.

Giving one candidate control of the party before securing the nomination is the rigging part. It’s normal for the nominee to take over the party, but to take it over before the nomination was secured clearly provides her an advantage over other candidates vying for the party’s nomination.

Absolutely. Thanks to our almost completely fucking useless for-profit media, our elections are more like a high-school popularity contests than it is a measure of candidates positions, strengths/weaknesses.

setting up the primary debate schedule in Clinton’s favor by limiting the number of debates and scheduling them outside of prime time

Said the guy who married someone who immigrated on the basis of being a model.