robotn1x0n
RobotN1X0N
robotn1x0n

As a Magnum RT owner, nothing is greater than a people mover/cargo hauler that has a HEMI thrown in. Also had the opportunity of driving a Grand Cherokee SRT from Calgary to Winnipeg (like a twelve hour long trip) and was determined that it was going to be my next vehicle. Then I remembered cost of fuel. Then I

Surprising, but kudos to Jag. The XJ13 is thought to be worth a metric ton of money (offer of 7 mill GBP was declined 20 years ago). It’s a 1 of 1 prototype.

BRZ is lighter, gets worse gas mileage, it cost 6k more than an FoST, is does not baby, it provides the same performance as FoST whether on track or quarter mile, as I said resale value is it. I’m not a Ford fans these are facts. If you really need to rewind I’ll tell you that my car, a crappy 09 Cobalt SS runs

I owned an S2k in the SF bay area. No torque in the city was a pain in the ass. Ringing its neck was fun on back roads the handling was sublime. Changing to an STi was a different animal and made that thing feel slow as a civic...everywhere. Do I still miss it? Yes, but that’s because the S2k is pretty, sounds good,

Unfortunately, that’s just not how it works. I don’t work for Subaru or Toyota so I can’t comment on exactly what’s wrong, but adding an OEM turbo is NOT as simple as literally just dropping one in. Yes, the motor can take it (as evidenced by the WRX) - but what about the trans? I actually don’t know if it’s the same

Toy for now and forever. 7634 miles in the first year, despite New England.

Everyone who hates on one of these but doesn’t hate on the Miata baffles me. They have the same exact purpose, with different packaging (one a 2-seat roadster, the other a 2+2 in a pinch, with a bit more cargo space, folding rear seats and a roof). Especially when lots of commenters are very likely driving a

So it’s ok for a heavier, 4 door, much cheaper car to be the same performance specs as the BRZ? We always have to have this discussion. They both have the same acceleration and lap times. The only justification for the BRZ is resale value. It’s definitely not more of a drivers car.

I did drive it. At the time, I had a speed3. Then I got a 370z. I preferred both by far to the fr-s. I understand that some people like them, but there’s also alot who brag about how fast they are.

There’s different reasons why the 0-60 times are identical. The ST does it in that time because of lack of traction. The BFZ-FR-S does it because of the lack of power. Just look at their quarter mile times to show that. The ST can also seat 4 adults with relative ease.

A few points on the Alfa flat-12;

Haha that makes even less sense to me then. The Army’s 155s also use separate powder/projectiles. It makes you wonder what it is that makes it 1000% more expensive, and what is unique to the LRLAP that allows it the range they are stating? The longer barrel could help, and additional charges on top of a

Clarifying a couple of things:

The first tanks in WWI sucked, does that mean the British should have said “well I guess this whole idea is bad?”

Shorter range guns for the Iowa, but it does have more of them, plus it floats.

Dammit, beat me to do. Even blind people love this video.