A better way to generate controversy:
A better way to generate controversy:
“you Green is wrong, but also believe the person proving he’s wrong is also wrong (or simply worthless)?”
No, I don’t, because, as my comments and replies show, I’m thoughtful and reflective. :)
I literally can’t tell if you’re being sarcastic, but that’s actually what happens mechanically. Find any video of someone being pushed, from the front, in mid-air.
Well, if I jump and get hit in the chest, I think my legs are going to kick forward. Not “Rockette” style, but forward.
Kindly explain wtf you are talking about. Did I make an excuse for someone? Or did I criticize the musings of a so-called expert, despite believing that Green is intentionally kicking other players? I can’t remember, please let me know.
No, I get the point of the article, and why they “brought in an expert” here. However, I respectfully suggest you are missing my point, which is this: the expert did a pretty shitty / incomplete job, and supplemented that shitty job with speculation about Green’s mental states.
That wasn’t worded well, so lemme clarify: she was opinion on OTHER causal mechanisms, namely, Green’s psychological attributes. For example, she says: “For Draymond to lift his leg into the air, high enough to hit another player, is not kinesthetically sound. If you ask me, it’s careless.” But “careless” is a…
Dear Arnold Spidervagina,
I’m truly sorry. I had no idea that good faith criticism of a kinesiologist could retroactively lead to 26 million people voting for a cartoon villain.
Google “Gimme Pizza slo-mo” and then tell me pizza isn’t just tool for demonic pedos.
I’m saying neither.
I hope my reply here stays buried, because I am enjoying the vitriol. But I actually think Draymond’s kicks are intentional.
I have no idea why I’m getting the hate either, but it’s kinda fun! I’m like an earnest, unintentional troll.
I’ve been practicing for 10 years now.
Nothing about the opinions of this expert were illuminating in any respect, especially when the expert is opining on causal mechanisms far outside her area of expertise (i.e., her psychologizing explanation of Green’s kicks).
Hmm this is all pretty dumb.
wat
Vince Staples did very fine work on this otherwise terrible show.
Two observations: