*Morbius has entered the chat*

Do you carry a jerry, in case you hit that low ‘E’ before you make the 5th station??

It’s too late. After I read this entry above, I thought, “Hmm, I should probably not think too hard about this one” and then it was all over... #PandorasBox

Throw the incendiary title away. We need driverless cars with smart, multilayered systems to alleviate the present day rideshare induced congestion.

This dazzle wrap isn’t doing a very good job at obscuring the shape of the car...

This strikes me as a necessary step in the evolution toward a fully augmented driving experience. I wouldn’t be surprised to see a future where windowless cars are a thing. After reading that, you’re trying to think of all the thousands of hurdles between now and then, but I’m telling you, I see the future and this is…

When I read this story, this is all that comes to mind:

I’m not dredging the comments to see if anyone else has made this connection, but when I see this “mod” this is what comes to mind:

According to xrayrisk.com your average abdominal xray delivers 0.7 milli-grays (0.0007 Gy), so in essence the level of irradiation this jawbone (and its human) were exposed to is the equivalent of 13,514 abdominal xrays instantaneously.

This is the one that has me scratching my brain:

A solid one-two knowckout.

I’m waiting for the google ad algorithms to pick up on it and suggest it to one of those spacey Etsy shops. T-Minus 3 weeks before it shows up in our banner ads and I can hardly wait :)

True, I am not. You have read me right. +1 star.

Touche, salesman. I don’t have data to refute your claim and you seem to be confident in your rebuttal, but I think it’s the principle of the matter: there was much effort put into this published article, including digital animation. I wager we would all be more wowed if they had gone that extra AU to make it that…

No, not useless: Interesting, but obvious was the claim. Still interesting. still obvious.

The whole calculation is interesting, but ultimately quite captain obvious. The kernel of the implication is that Mercury is on average the closest to each of the planets... because it’s the closest one to the sun, or the (approximate) centre of each planet’s orbit, and is never much further than half the diameter of…

Came here for this.