Was it a silent film?

Eh, I don't know. Don't? You seem to though, and that is interesting because I didn't ask you to.

I get points 1 and 2, but those can be applied outside sports.

Basically that coming out is great, but to how many is it really the story? Is the need for content greater than our collective care about the content? We click, but how many care? I feel there is a wide rift here: the few who care immensely, and the many who won't say they don't care that much.

But it's a human story, not a sports story. And I think that's what's odd. Even with the 90s Bulls, when Jordan's private life would have admittedly been just amazing to witness, it was still about the sport, almost exclusively. Very little was detailed about the players after showers.

I recognize the insults. Deadspin pre-Gawker was original. This is formulaic. That said, I get that you care. Thank you for responding. I'm gathering evidence and it's leading to what I kind of thought originally.

Well don't I feel like an a-hole.

Interesting and thank you. The second point you brought up is very interesting. Damage to sports via advocacy. I never considered that before.

I know why someone would read the article if interested, and I agree that the effort seems to be there. What I'm wondering is essentially this:

TLDR just have a question.

Yes it does. Are you familiar with Shariah or just the ways it is commonly defended?

Just horrible. This man should be in jail for a long, long time.