robertpjohns
Robert Johns
robertpjohns

It’s a branding issue. Trademarks are supposed indicate a single source of goods. The argument is that consumers would buy the Roxor assuming an affiliation with Jeep/FCA when there is none. The brand confusion can mislead consumers into buying a product that they expect to have certain qualities or reliability based

Your apparent point is not helpful and contributes nothing.

YES!! Someone has to do the job at the nuclear waste dump and there should be proper protocols in place to minimize risk to the workers there. They definitely should be able to complain about the radiation danger if management is reckless in providing protections or addressing such danger.

Dude, based on your comments in this thread, you have, without a doubt, gotten jobs based on your “melanin or sexual plumbing.” I am not sure you realize this (and if you don’t, you need to get out more), but there are millions of jobs where minorities and women have almost no chance of getting. Diversity hiring

Or Sophie’s choice.

Why do people stay in abusive relationships? There are many reasons and it’s frequently a complex situation, which is different for everyone.

My understanding is that it depends on the dog and the diet, but yes, dog urine definitely can kill grass.  I believe the nitrogen from the urea in the urea burns the grass which is exacerbated by the salts in the urine. The problem will be worse if the dog pees right soon after fertilizer is applied. 

I am always curious to know where the line is for people when it comes to being cordial with others. How heinous does a person have to be before you will no longer shake their hand and laugh it up? Disagreeing about the righteousness of Keynesian, classical, or some other economic theory-sure, I suppose that’s not

Zero business acumen is a pretty strong take. I don’t think he just lucked into PayPal, Tesla, SpaceEx, etc. From my perspective, he has been pretty open about his objectives. He’s mentioned before that he wanted Tesla to quickly push the market toward electric cars, which I think has already happened. That was a

Googles “Shaynegree” 

Not a transcript as expressly stated in the memo. There is a quid pro quo in the memo (Z: Hey, thanks for that aid you previously gave us, that was great and we look forward to receiving further aid. T: do me a favor) Your statement also ignores the context that funding to Ukraine appropriated by Congress was frozen

Congress exercising its constitutional duty of oversight of the executive branch and their efforts to kill a Republican led investigation relating to conduct of said executive branch versus a President pressuring a foreign leader to investigate a political rival not currently holding office. If you can’t see the

The phone call did mention aid. Zelenskyy thanked Trump for the previous support from the United States and mentions “great support in the area of defense” and “ready to buy more Javelins”. Trump immediately follows that statement up, according to the released memo, saying “I would like you to do a favor though” and

I see one plaintiff lawyer finding the accusation to be credible. Another says he doesn’t see direct, irrefutable evidence that Paterno knew in the 70's. NOT unfounded as you state. I believe you would say WRONG. You wholesale dismissed an allegation that several professionals involved with the deposition found to be

What specifically is inaccurate in my statement? Knowing what I do today, I wish I had done more = admission that he didn’t do enough. Also, there was an accusation of illegal sexual contact with a minor. It is completely foreseeable that further conduct would continue. So, knowing that children continued to be raped,

The quote you provided is consistent with my statement that Paterno admitted he didn’t do enough.  And aahh yes, just like when FDR was told Pearl Harbor was being attacked and he waited a couple days to tell anyone else because he didn’t want to ruin their weekend and then call a House intelligence committee

Hey bootlicker, Schultz wasn’t the “Chief of Police”. He was Senior Vice President for Finance and Business. The “Chief of Police” reported to Schultz. Just like most police chiefs report to admin official, such as a mayor. No one with their head dislodged from their rectum would think an admin official is the “cops”.

Paterno himself admitted he didn’t do enough. Waiting a couple days because you didn’t want to ruin anyone’s weekend and then telling a PSU VP about the allegation and basically doing nothing else is a poor response from someone with his power. He failed and was rightly pilloried for it. I also haven’t seen any

He was 75 at the time of the 2001 allegation.  “Clueless old man” is inconsistent with evidence from that time period.  He had great power on campus and frequently wielded that power when he thought is was worth it to him.  

He said he never heard of rape and a man. How could his poor feeble mind possibly comprehend the concept? The MFer studied classics at Brown (or wherever).