Gladly paid.

They are exactly both of those things by doing exactly what you said as cover.

We’re still fighting battles from the ‘50's, huh? Commies, and the Reds?

The crazy ones still supporting Trump have latched onto the idea that Antifa is somehow equal to the communist party. Typically the uneducated gun toting rednecks who are fully brainwashed by Fox and Breitbart

“Commies”, huh?

Personally I’d like to see NRA members, without their guns, meet with NFL players to tell them that they’re a bunch of unpatriotic traitors to their faces............I can only imagine the fun that would ensue.

The NRA is not a gun rights lobby.

Sure, the NRA can buy a propaganda channel but I get questioned for my “Murder the rich” t-shirt. It’s a metaphor for murdering the rich, idiots.

I am shocked that the NRA would use a dog whistle ad campaign using jingoistic propaganda to exploit white anger and make money.

Please cite your source that Tig did anything beyond simply acknowledging that the rumors exist. That is not the same thing as “implying” he did it.

Probably not. She just went on the record last month. The headline: “Jen Kirkman Clarifies That Louis C.K. Didn’t Harass Her”

You don’t know the difference between “accused” and “rumors”, then? I mean, the piece you link to even uses the word “rumors” right in the title, and somehow you got to “accused”.

Jen Kirkman has already “gone on the record” to the Village Voice a couple weeks ago, and she specifically said that nothing happened between them, period.

agreed. this is really shitty.

weaker than weak.

While I agree with that phenomenon generally, how much of the “fire” originates from these very blogs? And JK has recently suggested he was never the subject of her comments. That’s precisely why the blowback here.

Nick, you need to rethink your comments here. You are coming across as very close-minded and overly-sensitive.

That link itself states it’s all conjecture and innuendo. First, Kirkman has since said that it flat out wasn’t Louis CK... so that “almost certainly” is factually false. Second, Notaro herself has stated he has to deal with the rumors based upon Gawker’s two items and Kirman’s supposed confirmation. Neither Gawker…

“We could have chosen Roman Polanski, but we chose to keep going in on Louis CK anyway.”

The most you will get is that he hit on her while he was married and then asked her to feature for him on the road. That is all it ever was. People attributing anything else to her have been misunderstanding what she said forever. Spurred on by the former Gawker sites. Which were the source of the *other* allegation…