robertogreen
robertogreen
robertogreen

can he take jose mourinho with him?

no.

my personal experience with stoya was watching her tear down my wife for wanting to do a (non-porn) photo shoot with james. stoya was nasty, vindictive, and vicious, and lied copiously in her own blog post about the whole thing. it was some serious woman-on-woman bullshit.

i’m so glad this guy is making sure there’s more drunk driving in texas. what an excellent use of his skills.

unfortunately a supreme court where business-fellators kagan and breyer constitute the “left” and the “right” is synedoche for “whatever the chamber of commerce wants” you indeed can lobby in pretty astounding ways. the only way to change this given buckley and citizens is through a constitutional amendment.

i do believe it! but our democratic and republican presidents have put into place corporate-fellating supreme court justices, so absent a constitutional amendment, that belief is useless. the “spirit” is interpreted, not magickal.

sure, in theory, but in practice how do you differentiate? corporations clearly have the right to have their voices heard, and i don’t think anyone, even the most fundamentalists anti-money-in-politics person, believes anything different. it’s the scale that pisses most of us off, and the institutionalization that

if you don’t think that people’s complaints about lobbying existed pre-citizens united, or indeed pre buckley vs. valeo (the real culprit), you haven’t done your research. lobbying hits people’s that-ain’t-right bone, and has since the 70s. however, the right of direct redress is so strong that i cannot conceive of

once you do away with that pesky first amendment, and the constitution’s focus on the ability of the people to seek redress from their elected representatives, you can ban lobbying.

Hey German bankers—maybe, after you wipe up the mess left by your biggest manufacturer VW and your most important sports event the 2006 WC, you can get back to lecturing the Greek people about what morally loose people they are.

the statement did not continue: “where normally we’d allow you to continue having your children learn to play a sport which results in permanent irreversible brain injury from a very young age, can lead to fatalities as it has four times THIS MONTH, and is associated with pretty much every core evil known to american

why is a kid who goes to umass hanging out at uconn? storrs < amherst.

having lived near enough to that neighborhood that i taught my son to ride his bike, right there on that block, i can appreciate the humor this whole thing engenders, but also too: FUCK YOU ASSHOLE MY FUCKING CHILDREN PLAY THERE YOU PATHETIC PIECE OF SHIT.

this shit is inevitable, is a feature, not a bug, of this sport. it’s not right, and i’m pretty sure that most of you in the newsroom at gawker are aware of how fucked up it is, but still you cover it like it’s just a thing! dude hurt his head for some reason! wonder why.

he “got a pretty good shot there” because...is there a because?

good news, he was doing it in the service of making sure that his coach and AD make lots of money all off of his hard work. if the injury sticks, he’ll lose his scholarship and not have his insurance cover long term damage.

that just the colts keeping the fans in the game. NFL Preseason: where only the injuries matter.

at this point being a fan of the NFL is exactly the same as voting republican.

a true story: my first job out of college (and the reason i dropped out of same) was to work for Gore Vidal, doing research and general factotum-ing. while i was researching the calling of a constitutional convention for a piece he was writing, he came to LA to speak at Fairfax High School about his historical novels.

i’ve seen a lot of movies about this, so i know for a fact: love can transcend this, and even in another universe the male lead has gone into he can communicate with the female lead. Love is the Fifth Element. etc.