Sloping roofline: “I’m not a regular CUV, I’m a cool CUV”.

wow that was close

Yeah, it’s atrocious.  Very half-assed looking, and jarring.  Doesn’t flow at all.

The result: Visualize Baymax diarrhea after 2am Taco Bell.

That is a deeply unfortunate choice they made there.

No shit. That is just lazy and crude. Pretty much the opposite of what a luxury car should stand for. I am not even a Benz fanboi but I am irrationally strongly disappointed in them for doing this. That is not Mercedes-worthy.

Yeah, it simultaneously screams “Look at my classy paintjob!” as well as “We were too cheap to do it properly!”. Not a good look.

I agree this is kind of an unnecessarily assholish snipe at the big 3. Regardless of non-Tesla companies previously being slower to the line and trailing Tesla in pushing self-driving vehicles, they’re rapidly closing the gap or have essentially closed it

I don’t expect a New York blogger to know anything about what the manufacturers are up to.

Search “Hummer” Replace all “Bronco”

You forgot to mention that in ‘84, GM bought EDS, the Ross Perot created data services company. That was part of Smiths 10% non-auto income push along with Hughes and a bunch of other things. Now, Saturn was created at about the same time and they released the EV1 about ten years later in 1996. The funniest story I…

All the whining about “Ipads glued to dashboards” is going to look just as foolish and pathetic in the future as this does now.

So basically the same thing that happens to a gas truck when it tows things will happen to an electric one.

His insurance isn’t going to do anything.  Michigan is a no-fault state.

Regardless of actual fault here, this is why I always cringe when I looks at what the state minimums for liability are.

Pointless death as a result of one of the more pointless trends of my lifetime.

Yes. Let me know if you need a letter from your (automotive) doctor.

It’s no more wasteful than covering a football field in dirt for supercross.

your story seems to completely validate the premise of the article that the police are bad at deciding who and when to stop?