roadrunnerzo6stigt
We all are, act accordingly.
roadrunnerzo6stigt

You sound just like my buddy George.

Yes, I didn’t consider that’s what he meant when i read it at first... my mistake.

Ahh I see what you were driving at.

50%?

Agreed.  I found that shocking as well, why not just drive a straight line through the S-section then. When rules become arbitrary like that it’s difficult to take it seriously.

What’s the tow rating of a R63?

XFQ package gets you 10" front wheels. That’s going to be one raked look.

Everything looked great until the rear-end.  Those sad droopy looking tail-lights are just awful.

The ripple effect that impact has through the chassis is just awful to watch.

I disagree, I think they have followed that idea to its logical conclusion and based on past experiences, they are banking on the government to bail them out with one of these universal basic income proposals.

The “Drive Away Auto Sales” sign pretty much ended any further review.

Keep dollars spent apples to apples and you could go with a bigger turbo on the Abarth and supporting mods and make 300whp.

If Bugatti wasn’t backed by VW I could understand this timeline but if I was spending $12.5MM and knew they had VW’s tooling and man power to tap into, I would not find this exceptable.

Where’s the CP option?

The power discrepancy is an easy fix with nothing more than a simple tune on the Abarth’s boosted mill, but god help you if the dealership decides that you’ve voided the warranty because you’ll be paying through the nose for repairs.

I like how your buddy lives!

I forgot sarcasm has no place on the internet.

Ohhhhh.... so F1, Indy Car, Prototype racing all have it wrong I guess.

Do we know how many are destined for the US?

Agreed.   And it’s not like Toyota was busy engineering drivetrains or anything....  this really should have been the launch edition color scheme.