The fact that these questions even need to be asked should be indictment enough of how badly our nation’s press is failing us.

I like this comment.

Live from MackSeven3's house:

Despite Trump’s claims, many journalist rely on integrity and not burning bridges.

That being said, I would love, LOVE, if a journalists gave us a “Fuck it” moment.

Looking at you CNN.

So, I teach Rhet/Comp (argumentative logic in a written capacity) at the college level, and have for the last twelve years.

The level of obfuscation, dissemblance, and general reliance on logical fallacies that this administration continues to engage in is absolutely flabbergasting. I’m no political pundit, but I do…

They have a professional term for that. It’s called “gaslighting”.

Perhaps, like Megyn Kelly, they’ve just got a shame kink?

Hah. Possum Queen. With her constantly adopted “perplexed cow” face.

What value is there in these WH press briefings? Why are so many publications not more aggressively going after SHS? Just so they can maintain their credentials and be daily yelled at and belittled by a lying piece of shit?

One of the joyous side consequences when this godforsaken regime finally hits the shitter will be not having to hear about the antics of The Possum Queen on a near-daily basis.

What a douchebag you are.

Are you high?

“I’m not trying to blame the victim here, but the victim should have really not been such a whore. It’s really her fault for being blackmailed.” You are the reason blackmail like this is effective.

What is the nuance or complexity that you think is added by focusing on her own personal choices? There is none. His actions are just as wrong whether she had an affair or not. Nothing about her actions changes the wrongness of his actions. There is no ambiguity among right or wrong about his actions.

You seem to be having some trouble understanding why people are disagreeing with you. While what you’re stating may be nominally a reasonable recommendation on the face of it, given all the facts and circumstances here you’re absolutely focusing on one of the more trivial factors to lay blame on the victim. Yes, it is…

I wouldn’t go so far as to describe Greitens as a “person”.

I much prefer “don’t take nude photos against a woman’s will and then use the threat of them to buy her silence” .... but you do you.

Yeah, dumb fuck, I’m aware that you are able to focus on what you want. I’m criticizing that area of focus because I don’t see how it’s any of your concern WHATSOEVER what her personal choices (that aren’t abusive or criminal) are. There is nothing fucking stupider than a person who responds to criticism of opinion…

How exactly do you suggest a single guy wouldn’t have taken shots of her naked and blackmailed her? Because you do realize that’s the issue here? Blackmail?

I see you’re already being rightfully dragged for this. Let me pile on:

lol, i love the “conservative” next to “navy seal”. Like there is any other kind? Also, that he is hilariously insecure that he has to put that word there in an ad where hes shooting guns.