rmcdenziloe
Denziloe
rmcdenziloe

Yes, I did. And I was agreeing with your point. Had the author included the very important word "closed," the basic premise of the article - that cells somehow defy physics - would no longer be a premise. I'm on your side, bro.

Because the article's basic premise vanishes into thin air if you include it?

You know what's absolutely impossible? A system going from chaos to order.

You know what's absolutely impossible? A system going from chaos to order.

I think it's hilarious how you don't understand that Slough is genuinely shitty & is a byword for shittyness to the point where it has been immortalised in poetry form.

Dude, people did complain a lot about the changes in LOTR. They complained almost as much as they are now. The difference is that, for all that you may dislike the liberties Jackson took in LOTR, they were really good movies in their own right. The Hobbit movies took liberties, and are also bad movies. People aren't

My favourite of these three films is still the first. And no, it's not fantastic or anything, but it was enjoyable. I had fun, tons of fun watching it. It felt like I was re-discovering sides of Middle-Earth that I had sort of forgotten about: the non-serious parts, the parts where a Hobbit goes out for adventure and,

This does not help our side you idiot.

Even though Marvin was the only acceptable part of that movie. If that movie ever happened. Which it did not.

You don't need the study on women to make a research statement about men (unless you state something that depends on a relative statement about women). They are just responsibly letting you know that they used a narrow focus. That's a good thing in science. Eliminate variables. Gender / Sex contains a massive bag of

I anticipated the question while waiting for the page to come up, and figured out in that space of time that the mirror has to be at least half the width and height of you or the part of you you want to see.

I am talking about the internet in general.

I actually liked the Goblin Town sequence for the most part, even though they could have made the action less cartoonish. It was one of the spots where I feel the CG was done right; both the setting and the goblins themselves looked great. But I absolutely agree with the barrel riding sequence being both too long and

Exactly. The thing that bothered me most watching this film was that I felt it honestly could have worked; with almost 20 named characters from the book - plus the half dozen brought in from LOTR and the few original creations - this really could have justified the runtime. In the book it always seemed like the only

Also, she needs to learn when you're telling a story...

No, she won't. She'll release 12 brief essays about her work, some, but probably not all, from a point of view within that fictitious world.

Stephen Hawkins is one of the most important theoretical physicist ever. His work in in quantum gravity is groundbreaking and even if a grand unifying theory is posited during his lifetime I'm sure that when it will be he will be credited or mentioned in some form. Stephen Hawkins has spent his life studying and

GPS isn't even a relevant analogy. This just describes any coordinate system; GPS implies that there's some active tracking and reporting going on.

I think he missed a trick by ending it so early. He should of left it to see what the longest opening actually was.