rlw2112
Barf
rlw2112

I don’t see how a comment about what “most people” are doing can be ableist. It is perfectly reasonable for a person to continue to mask — I do on public transportation. And some people (like Hader) have particularly good reasons to want to mask, and we should respect that. But most people have assessed the risks

Uh, Zendaya’s mom is white. Here she is with both her parents.

Tell me you didn’t watch (or do any research) without telling me you didn’t watch. 

“you got to see an uncle and niece have sex”

For Hamm I have three words for you ‘live action Archer’.

Oh man, Hamm would be perfect as Young Drebin. Now I need this to happen immediately.

I think Hamm can definitely play someone with utmost confidence in the same sorta way that Leslie Nielsen could. Charm but keeping it completely straight.

Heck, just saying that makes me kinda wish they did a Naked Gun but with Hamm as a young Frank Drebin. 

Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?

“How to deal with these star upon which so many of our beloved characters wish come true?” she asked.

Written in his downtime from his job as the Cook County Assessor, I’m guessing.

senor spielbergo.

- S. Spielberg

“Hello Peter Parker” doesn’t get enough credit, because it’s dropped right in the middle of that scene, but it’s a really big note to hit for such a small interaction. She sees how much Pete is struggling to hold it together there and immediately falls into big sister mode. She’s amused at the introduction but is

The Boys coverage tends to focus on Antony Starr and Karen Fukuhara’s incredible performances, but Erin Moriarty has done phenomenal work as Starlight. In the first season her character has to be brutalized, exploited, and silenced but Erin still plays her with agency and driving her own story. That’s a tough line to

Fortunately, by the time she’s conservative again, she’ll be old enough that no one will be writing articles about her political views.

The misreading of the final battle is very interesting to me because as I stated in my initial comment in this thread, I found it very odd that the reviewer thought that the episode’s central thesis was that Viserys has become even more ineffectual as a king.

Agreed, this reviewer really has a very pedestrian understanding of the show, misreads a lot of plot points (like that the final battle of this episode featured “two dragons” sent by Viserys, when the episode clearly shows that’s not what’s happening), and makes groundless speculation (last week’s “stray observation”

Welcome back to House Of The Dragon, the show designed especially for George R.R. Martin fans who wished that Game Of Thrones featured 80-percent more slow-moving court intrigue.

Still really enjoying it!

It’s a challenge, you know: one doesn’t want to respond to a review with “you just don’t get it man” because the whole purpose of a program like this is to invite discussion: the ambiguities and uncertainties are explicitly designed to position different audiences differently. Its not overly prescriptive about where

The show would have been better off to deviate from the book and kill Viserys off during the hunt given how weak his character development has been and how the plot needs to get moving someplace if they’re not willing or able to do it with the characters.