How about a Section 31 series?

FUCK YES!!! (if it happens, that is) Might be the most exciting Trek possibility in ages.

However, The Hollywood Reporter might have details on at least one of those mysterious limited series. The trade reports that one show in Kurtzman’s new deal could bring back one of Trek’s most beloved characters: Sir Patrick Stewart’s Captain Jean-Luc Picard.

Thank goodness Kitty didn’t marry Star-Lord,

Looking at the cover I can only imagine the nightmare and logistics that planning an X-men wedding must cause.

Man, not gonna lie, I was really liking the Peter Quill/Kitty Pryde thing that was going on in GotG a while back. I understand why it had to end, but I’m not going to lie, I was really digging it.

Y’know what would be nice? Like *one* Asian face in that collage of whiteness.

I hope the dialogue is, “Peter, I just remembered that I’m not 14 anymore and you once tried to kill my new boyfriend in a jealous rage. Buh-bye!”

Considering that Kitty and Piotr seemed to be rushing into marriage, Kitty deciding it wasn’t right seems actually to be the right decision. Now, as for Rogue and Gambit...well, they did get back together in Thompson’s excellent Rogue & Gambit mini and they have a history of impulsive decisions, so I’m perfectly okay…

In context, definitely a good word. When Brits like something, we are bullish as fuck. See the public outcry over the reduction is size of a tin of Quality Street or the increase in price of a Freddo chocolate frog. Seriously, a chocolate frog became the British public’s measure for inflation.

Yeah, I can see them possibly threatening them like:

I was campaigning in Waterford city and last night us organisers went for dinner together - we took a photo in the apple market with our banner and the smoking area stood up and gave us a round of applause, and a load of people came out of Geoffs to give us more applause. It was amazing, really special 💙💙💙

They wouldn’t even without the current situation. There are several reasons why they really, really don’t want to reinstate direct rule.

Sure we all thought the turnout would be low and it was on a knife edge until like, yesterday! And in fairness, it wasn’t an easy sell, not at all, it was a hard, gruelling, complicated sell, but people listened to all our stories and pleas and arguments and bought it. Yay!

You mean the English government have yet another self-inflicted crisis on their hands? I’ll try to look surprised at this.

Really can’t see that happening. We haven’t been in that place for a very, very long time. An abortion referendum certainly wouldn’t be the catalyst for that kind of thing. It’s in neither the Republican, nor the Loyalist wheelhouse. Loyalists are too consumed with their racketeering, drug dealing, DUP cosy-ups, and…

Oh my god Cork East ye were making us wait!! Can’t complain, though, cause the high turnout was brilliant.

Your point is stellar, the following is also true, sadly:

“It’s terrible that the people of Northern Ireland the United States are effectively held hostage by religious fundamentalism. (a good portion of) The people are so much more socially progressive than their representatives would lead you to believe.”

66.4% in favor and 33.6% against is almost the complete reverse of the 1983 referendum that put in the 8th amendment n place (it was 67% for, 33% against back then) and it’s much bigger disparity than the 1995 referendum that made divorce legal that was much, much closer (50.28% for vs 49.72% against).

TaForMna is my favorite hashtag of all time and I was seeing quite a bit of it. People were really energized.