You boys are playing this game WRONG...

are... are.. are.. nope.

business decisions sometimes get voted on by a lot more than a few hundred. Clearly you don’t know how publicly traded companies work when often hundreds of thousands of stock holders vote for and against a variety of business decisions. Now with that said, hopefully you learned something new.

asking why aren’t we giving an equal amount of shit to other candidates since they’re all shitty. It gives off a false sense of approval to life time politicians who aren’t worse than Trump.

How did that work out w/ Bush and Obama? Point is, they’re all the same.

Improvement over what? We’ve had basically the same policy over the last 50+ years. War, Taxes, Inflation, Less Freedoms - Rinse, Repeat.. I agree, Trump probably won’t be better but at least he’s less of a risk of doing what “special interests” want him to do in exchange for 2 things he’ll already have... Power and…

You’re right. Running a business is harder, you have to actually turn a profit. Something Trump is marginally good at and the rest of his competition is 100% incapable of. My point in all of this is all the options suck, and they are only good for those with their hands firmly in the winner’s pocket. Good luck w/ your…

Hey, thats my favorite Pink Floyd song!

1 star for you sir.

Why? because he’s Nick fucking Mason, thats why.

compare that to his competitors... the point is, why are we shitting on only one bad candidate? When you can shit on worse?

No arguments. Still beats the piss out of politicians who have done what? Steal Millions and pissed it away ... My point is we’re arguing over Bad vs. Worse and Worse gets the pass while we shit on bad.

Poor businessmen? Would hate to know your opinion on the business acumen of the other politicians running for office. Btw, gullibility lies w/ those like you who vote for promise and change.

clearly the point flew over your head. There are no good alternatives, so why pick on the one who isn’t a life long political leech?

Not quite, but good to know you’re one of those folks who feels a moral obligation to taking from what someone else earns. How noble of you.

... didn’t disagree with one word you said. How sad though, that such a resume is still superior to any of your prototypical life time politician / lawyer.

who are you calling casual?

Here here! Now lets see if the number of articles shitting on them will be equal to those on Trump. Again, my point here is hypocrisy.

So the only way you can be a success is if you start from nothing? Meanwhile, those liars and thieves who use their office for political and monetary gain, - what shall we call them?