You talking crazy...

drag and drop bitch.

Like when the female police officer describes a perp as a 6ft white Male with tattoos. Yes, very logical conclusion by you.

When police refer to any person of interest or suspect. They describe the individual as a male or female of X height, color, etc..

Apparently Mr. Belding ate his cooler and hipper brother.

Except you have no evidence of Chaos, merely anarchy which in itself is the true definition of freedom. Meanwhile with Govt - I already have plenty of examples of chaotic and or criminal activity in the form of theft and murder against innocent people both domestically and abroad.

Classic case for why public property is a shitty idea. Private spaces and owners get to do what they want with their spot. Not a foreign idea since we already do this with our homes. Extending it out to the roads isn't rock science - unless you're a communist. Way too complicated for them.

Capitalism: mutual beneficial agreement where no one is forcing you to cooperate.

says.. the mooch who gets to park without lifting an ounce of snow.

1. No well organized criminal organization appreciates a whistleblower. The US govt has proven that.

Anything to make the NSA's job easier when it comes to monitoring and possibly controlling my car is an awesome idea.

how much of that 7.6 were corporations/Govt? Car rentals, State and Federal vehicles, etc.. ? Throws that number way off. Possibly closer to 4-5%

Clearly you're thick... so let me spell this out for you in a manner that a 7 year old will understand.

private industry handles cars, houses, and to some extent hospitals & schools. Churches build their own through donations. Military weapons and the sort related to the Military or any COTS products are all tax money, taken by people like myself and others who work hard for it and would rather spend it on more…

Spending billions on weapons designed to either kill humans or rot in warehouses. Nothing gives me a warmer and fuzzier feeling inside.

For the Record I pictured all types of jobs. High paying exec jobs, middle of the road jobs, and those you describe as poor/crappy/low paying jobs. What do all 3 have in common? They were all jobs that each individual chose to take because they preferred it over the alternative.

What helps a starving population is the freedom to own property and thus trade. To dig themselves OUT of poverty. I know you hate reading points that refute your nonsense but consider my point of modern day Malaysia or Singapore and compare it to those African communities that resembled those 2 countries just…

Unless you can show me proof that they threaten those people with Guns or Jail to work for them, (like the way Govts do) then your argument holds zero merit. With that I'll leave you with a few undisputable facts.

And what was the alternative for those people? Poverty / Starvation? God knows it wasn't a better paying job with better work conditions because if it were the case, they'd take it. As for those work conditions, blame the lack of a free market and further competition in the area to allow competition to offer…

How DARE YOU defend a wealthy man who has done nothing but riddle this world with jobs and senseless opportunity. Don't you know creating wealth for hundreds of thousands of others is EVIL? Never mind reaping those diasterous rewards..