How do you know the US/British didn't do the hijacking? Oh that's right, they both have pristine records when it comes to working on the up and up/

Agreed, but we can say the same about almost every President we have. Of course, to hit home to what you said about who "won" - those writing our history books. Govt isn't really good at much except for stealing, squandering, killing, and of course lying. They're amazingly efficient at that.

If they mean crash as in landed, and Indian Ocean as in Diego Garcia, then that report would be accurate.

Today, we have our bosses merely looking at Facebook accounts to see if people are "worthy" of working where they work. What's changed?

I love how modern day people use their modern day sensibilities while having no clue how backwards thinking most were back then. For Christ's sake, we had Presidents admire Stalin, Hate Jews & Blacks, Endorse Racism, and publicly denounce gays all while wearing women's dresses in their private rooms. …

And that right there is the problem with your article. You're using a GOV CPI calculator which uses a formula that has been revised how many times now over the years to under estimate the true cost of inflation? Try using the Old formula or link the salaries priced in Gold and see how much better those salaries look.…

I could be lit on fire and still would politely ask for you to not use Miller light in an attempt to put out the flames.

No more or less a slur than Jew. Short for Jew.

Jason,

Stories of a small minority of public rulers (you know, the same types we refer to as lying and corrupt politicians) telling the masses what they can or cannot do always amuses me. Then again Slaves did listen to their Mastah's - Or else!

Thank you for pointing out the type of legislation, but I wasn't asking for that. I was merely asking why its allowed if safety was the primary reason for forcing safety standards on the Auto Business. Last time I checked, the Auto Industry knows more about Motor Vehicles than Bureaucrat regulators, or am I wrong -…

If that nonsense were true, they wouldn't allow older cars designed with older safety standards to be driven on the road. I don't see anything wrong with a 2600lbs 40mpg Civic from the early 90s or late 80s. In fact, neither should folks who are big on limiting pollution but apparently you have an issue. Is it…

The penalty for misleading the public and putting them in danger 1.2 billion. The penalty for me, well there isn't one because I'm above the law.

And for those folks, they have options too. But imagine how much more inexpensive cars would be without so many of the "mandated" technology that people could do without or wanting to take the risk? I mean, what's the ultimate difference between being Free to buy a car capable of 220mph (w/ increased safety…

Maybe you didn't understand the transportation business? At the end of the day the consumer wants the product or service that provides the best value. In a world where a The US G0vt evaporates purchasing power from the US Dollar, value starts equating to cost. Apologies

Why should we be surprised?

Now that is what I call equality! yay Socialism

Chris Harris said it best. The Cayman is the Floyd Mayweather of sports cars. Pound for Pound [dollar for dollar] the best car in the world.

proof - there's really no difference between the two. It's COKE & DIET COKE.

Never stated my sources are factual. I've repeated already that both sides are armed with information and yet neither has shown any reason to dismiss the correlation. As for the "crack website" - can't one of those people also point to repeatable examples of bogus information that skated through the FDA and still…