richardjefferies--disqus
Richard Jefferies
richardjefferies--disqus

It looks good, and I dig on Wonder Woman as a character, but the slavery line was pretty stupid. A secretary is not a slave, especially not a civilian. A trench soldier is more a slave than a secretary and WW is to be going about killing me conscripted into the service by the bushel. It is certainly hard to

Also the voice of On-Star.

Good point, but also, to support your theory, why did they write Cyril saying "well time of death is only good to within one hour" if not the possibility that Veronica somehow manipulated the watch. Its a stretch i know. Maybe the watch was broken ahead of the murder.

The episode was called Bel Panto, it is a clear reference to the novel Bel Canto in which a terrorist hijack a dinner party of the fabulously wealth in Peru, even letting some go because there were too many. It even had a Stockholm syndrome story, though between a male hostage and a female terrorist. I'll grant you

They could have been real detectives but just showed up and started taking over the hostage situation even though they were never assigned to it.

Another good theory. I never considered that the first episode may have been the real Veronica Deanne. That would be awesome. I honestly hope she doesn't end up a bot, but rather a mastermind who purposefully pretended not to know who Archer was.

To find Dolphin boy, or more butter. "Sparks, I can't go back to margarine."

Heart of Archness was probably the pinnacle of Archer funniness. I've enjoyed much of it over the years, but for sustained funniness throughout three episodes, it will always be remembered.

Awwww, little Elton.

Pyro has always been a trait, what is missing is her love of fireman choking her during sex. That fetish hasn't come up in a while with her.

I liked her new take on it. I'm sure Judy Greer did that take more than once to find the perfect shriek.

Great, now I have to watch that again.

Time of death was 2:15 and Veronica was with Archer until, "very nearly 3."

Not me. I grew up with 80s television where every show had those bumpers, I guess it just feels right to me, given the show's, well kind of, setting.

I find them hilarious. I'm old enough to have watched Charlie's Angels, so I loved the nod.

Damn that's a good theory. We did have a nice monologue on MK Ultra. And being this is, sort of, very 80s in depiction, minus a few anachronisms, Veronica could have been in her 20s at the late portion of the program.

Not me. "It's not cob web-y anymore" made me nearly spit out my drink.

Well she has a child now, and she is torn between this career, such that is, and the super selfish father of her child, who ultimately she probably does have deep feelings for. yes, I know we don't want too much soap opera in a comedy, but I think Archer is better when it is being fascicle about deeper issues and not

That is good to hear.

I agree! To just ignore Woodhouse's existence is a bit rule. I agree that Season 1 and 2 Lana would have handled it differently, but Adam is right to have some change in Lana after the baby. I think anyway.