rhodafayemorgenstern
RhodaFayeMorgenstern
rhodafayemorgenstern

That movie is about adult women who enjoy sex. It literally has nothing to do with the rape of young girls.

Given the current declared options I’d probably vote for Warren but I really appreciate how Gillibrand stuck to her guns and forced that fuckwad Al Franken out even though the big party donors and the Clinton machine (but I repeat myself) promised to sandbag her national ambitions. And I believe in my heart it pushed

Why would you have to go to two weddings? No one is inviting anyone except for maybe a handful of people to the courthouse, that's what the party is for.

Iowa does NOT represent the party. The idea of it or New Hampshire being the states that set the tone of the Democratic debate is lunacy. Luckily, CA has moved our primary to March 3rd making us relevant. I think New York is also moving their date into mid February.

But Iowa represents all of middle America, or something.

Cohen: Are you working on another child?

I think you mean Kalabasas.

Well folks, I had a baby this week. 10 days before her due date, actually. Labor was extremely fast (less than 1.5 hours from start to finish) and we BARELY made it to the hospital (I seriously almost had her in the car), partly because we had to wait 20 min for my mother in law to show up from SIX BLOCKS away to

The Bennetts were on the poorer side of respectable gentility — they had an entailment which brought in enough money for the family to live on, but not nearly enough to provide the girls with a decent dowry. Economically-superior members of their same social class had no problem looking down on them. If the girls

100%. The whole “ruining the careers of people speaking out” thing has slipped down the memory hole.

Not just one daughter, but two daughters. There’s clearly a bonus multiplier for extra daughters when using them as a shield against sexual harassment claims. If he’d had thirty-seven daughters, we’d all have to apologize to him.

Whipping his dick out was bad enough, but he also actively tried to ruin the careers of those women and anyone who tried to report on it as well. People don’t talk about that enough. Like so much fucking hand-wringing over a guy’s “ruined reputation” and literally nothing about the reps of all the women he crushed

“And I really can’t see the Garofalo of the early 90s - the alt comic feminist - allowing a comic of that generation to skate so easily if they’d done something like that to her.”

She also dragged out the “he’s my friend” and “question the source”, despite the fact questioning the source(s) is an idiotic statement because he admitted he did what everyone said he did.

A good way for comedians to be left alone is to not have your manager book gigs at comedy clubs. It works; ask Dave Chapelle. It is also entirely possible to criticize C.K. while being his friend. You are not being disloyal by pointing out, when asked, that a good friend fucked up/is a fuck-up.

Look, I get standing up for a friend. But compare this to what Marc Maron said about C.K., also longtime friends. He had asked C.K. privately about the (at the time) rumors and Louis said they weren’t true. When C.K. admitted to the behavior, Maron said on the podcast that Louis had straight up lied to him and fuck

...if nothing else, care about his daughters. If nothing else, if you can find no compassion for him, which I think you should, think about how his daughters, who hear all of this stuff, feel.

She’s really using the “He has daughters!” excuse? And tossing in “I’ve known him forever!” and “You weren’t there!”

“......edgy, crass banter.”

Fur-blanc