Given Garland’s 2nd Amendment positions, I don’t think opposition will be that hard.

I was just pointing out that bs like this happens all of the time and now it seems like a big deal to many.

If the Senate wants to filibuster a vote, fine, that’s a tactic that they can use if they feel it’s necessary. What’s not okay is not even holding hearings. The Senate should hold hearings with Judge Garland, and can then decide from there whether to vote no and/or filibuster him. That’s the scenario that you’re…