rgallitan
GreatGreyBeast
rgallitan

Too soon.

To each their own, but as a Robyn Hode fan, it's my third favorite Brooks after Saddles and Frankenstein.

I think so. Weren't you one of the Little Rascals?

LEAVE US ALONE MEL BROOKS!

Men in Tights counts too, dammit!

The E depends very much on the angles you shoot it from, I think. I thought it was super cool the first time I saw it in theaters (I was like, 15, mind you), but when I got the toy I was all, "What is this no-necked troll of a starship? Was this really the one in the movie?" The more successful designs provide

Technically, George Clooney is the modern Grant, but I'd say Smith is a not-to-distant second. Maybe not as Fresh Prince, but he can play smooth - utterly comfortable in his own skin. DiCaprio… no. He's great at playing characters who act smooth, but you can see the nervous energy squirming beneath.

The Deported.

Alien Rises

Hudson as he appears in Edge of Tomorrow is extremely okay with me.

I'll take anything at this point. Just give me photography that's adequately lit and I'll call it a win. Just, please, anything to prove there's a rock bottom, and we'll take it from there.

You obviously didn't see him in Myst III.

The theory behind Resurrection was strong. I loved what they did with Ripley's character, and I loved the house of horrors failed clones scene. The rest of it just never quite … well, let me just say I was recently reminded that Ron Perlman was in it, and when Ron Perlman is in something and leaves no memory behind,

Like I say, I don't think who initiates really matters; there are plenty of examples of woman clearly initiating with Bond (though obviously he rarely needs a lot of convincing). What matters is how that act fits into the context of their character otherwise. It is true though that these are usually more "disposable"

Well then you, Vaughn and Millar have some catching up to do on your Bond films, because that happened all the time, especially in the Connery films. In the first one he comes back to his apartment to find the woman he just met waiting for him in her underwear (she was originally written to be nude). In the second

I'm not sure Millar really gets what parody or subversion actually is. He seems to have it confused with rote mimickry, like a hyper-violent version of Seltzer and Friedberg.

Btw, it looks like Jim Rash doesn't actually appear in Minority Report. But he has fascinating stories about the experience in that and several other tiny roles you didn't realize he had: http://www.vulture.com/2013…

I promise to watch at least one episode if they bring back Peter Stormare's character.

Her chebs were in Playboy ten years ago, so… not really.

I think we have a large generation now that saw it as kids, so there's nostalgia. It is handsomely produced, incredibly imaginative, often managing to be iconic despite itself. Hoffman/Hoskins are my definitive Hook/Smee. But Williams, though he should be perfect, doesn't quite work, and his real world family life -