I don't think anyone who actually hasn't heard of the Deep Dream project has any right to play style arbiter on the Internet. What the hell cave have you been in?! Obviously one bereft of swirling 15-eyed helldogs, so I don't think your opinion is really valid, jack.

It's really a shame what's happened to Smarf since he found Jesus. Breaks my heart to see him on TBN when I'm flipping channels. But I can't blame the guy for wanting to find a little stability in his life. :(

We appreciate the hard work you do as a style arbiter! No, no, no reasons or examples necessary — your assurance as a professional is certainly enough. After all, these things aren't subjective. Those of us who have mistakenly enjoyed the show will surely amend our ways instantly.

Jesus, can't even catch a reference to your own user name. Here's a two-headed coin, Harv: heads, you go home and sleep this off.

Hey, I'm a bleeding heart liberal and probably SHOULD hate killing deer on principle. But I'm also an Ohioan, so I just sympathize with you.

So basically, you're saying your original point of "never makes a J sound in English" is only correct if we disqualify two-thirds of the English language?

But… but… hipsters! Mythology! He's running out of words to not listen to you with!

Then perhaps there's a nice stamp-collecting or macrame website you would prefer to spend your time on. If there's anything we can do to assist in your migration, just let us know! You sure don't sound happy here.

Humor is a subjective quality, so the idea that there's any "actually" here is kind of thick-headed.

Technically, I believe you are currently bitching about hipsters.

Yeah, but that's not that interesting to hear unless you tell us *why*. In the absence of any details, it's just "some guy on the Internet didn't like this," and there's not much we can really do with that information except shrug, yanno? Care to give us some specifics of what didn't make it for you, and where you…

You're telling people "like it or don't" just two comments down from nitpicking somebody's grammar.

Uh, correct in so far as it goes, but I'm really not getting how it would make the headline less appropriate since sex is still the act that's being perverted in this case. I appreciate your drive for linguistic purity, but I don't think the "primarily" you're referring to really supports vanessasteck's little cavil…

Um. If your response to somebody claiming you're not being patronizing is to just calmly inform them you're not being patronizing and they have no reason to feel patronized, silly child… then yes, you are probably being extremely patronizing. You're certainly coming across that way to me, by apparently assuming that…

You're one of those people who "likes art that looks like stuff," arentcha, Ken.

And you don't think it could be because every specific complaint people are making is getting an insulting dismissal? I don't think every single objection to this specific project's methodology is "irrationally" defensive — yes, some of these people are clearly being reactionary assholes, but I've also seen some valid…

You're complaining about somebody posting a comment on a comment thread, in response to your own comment. Man, you are really, really out of ideas here, aren't you.

I like how you used CIA Director to throw another arbitrary five years in there. God, it embarrasses me when people on my own side play these little confirmation bias games.

Great satire account!

Probably people very similar to the people who complain about paying attention to this stuff.