rexruthor
Publius
rexruthor

Yes. It’s only weird when it’s new. I had a BMW with the new electronic auto shifter. I had read criticism that it wasn’t “intuitive.” Well, it may not have been familiar, but after a couple of days of driving it was quite intuitive. Nowadays when I drive a car that doesn’t automatically go into “Park” when I turn the

“But the lights work great!”

It certainly seemed like they were going that direction with some of the Kia models, didn't it? Like you I'm wondering what happens to Kia in all this.

Because nothing makes me want to buy a car more than a good cup of coffee. Seriously, Caddy’s problem is that it chose not to go the Audi route: Audi started off its renaissance in the mid- to late-90s by underpricing BMW and Mercedes. They captured a little more market share each year, and stopped having to lower

Or ignoring reports of wrongdoing that were brought to their attention.

Thanks—yeah, that’s what got me, too: Frozen rope from right field to home plate. Not to mention dead on target.

What was the speed of his throw from the outfield? It looked like 105 mph and right on the money.

And on cars these days they’re at the perfect angle, relative to the driver, to obscure your view of a pedestrian (especially on the driver’s side) who is walking towards a collision point. not to mention the ped is probably engrossed in his or her phone and isn’t watching anyway.

Could just be the way they make the Lightning cable. As you say, I’m not out of pocket much.

My only experience with Monoprice is with Lightning cables, but they had very poor build quality (lightning connector pulled out of housing on two cables). I like Anker, though don’t know if they myake USB-C.

Like Amazon does. Pisses me off.

I think having the twin turbos makes a difference. I had the twin turbo in a 535i and the power delivery was very smooth.

4 percent increase in fatalities over the prior speed, not 4 percent of the cars on the road. I.e, say 60 mph yields 100 fatalities. 65 mph would yield 104, which includes the 100 already accounted for by the 60 mph speed.

Keep in mind, though, that the fact that a cop is factually wrong doesn’t make his arrest unlawful. Say an escaped killer is on the loose. A cop comes across someone who very closely matches the description, so he arrests him. Turns out he has the wrong guy. But Mr. Arrestee can’t lawfully resist Mr. Cop’s lawful

YES. If I could give your answer and your warning two stars, I would.

An officer could have probable cause to arrest you for something, but the prosecutor could determine s/he doesn’t have enough of a case for that something to bring charges. If you resisted the officer’s otherwise lawful arrest, you could still be charged with reisting arrest even though no charges were filed for the

Cool your jets, bro! I was trying to be nice (e.g., I acknowledged I was being pedantic by signing “That guy”). But clearly we have unearthed some deep-seated feelings of inadequacy inside you. Remember: You started trolling me, so here goes:

I would rather be guilty of not picking up on an autocorrect error than fucking up my grammar, Justin. Wouldn’t you?

“affected”, not “effected”.

You meant YUUUGE, of course, right? Seriously, roughly speaking how many euros could be involved in those CO2 tax issues?