Wow!

Look, try not to stay angry at me because you revealed the ugliness not very far from the surface of comments you claim are innocuous. Tip: take a closer look at who's flying off the handle and insulting people whose opinions differ from yours.

I don't care enough to dredge up your comments, clytie, because from the get-go you don't understand the difference between not agreeing about the merits of any given thing, versus expressing hatred of a person. And yes, I do call people on so easily expressing hatred, whether it be about a pop star or anyone else…

clytie clytie clytie that's not how it went. I expressed my opinion of hating on a pop star. You then emphasized hatred, at which point I made a joking reference to the obvious genetic linkage, so then you…well, never mind, the basic gist is that "idiotic," "pathetic" and "troll-type" are adjectives used to describe…

Seething rage is an exaggeration, don't you think? I made a simple observation about behavior: that's it's purely idiotic to express hatred for people you don't know. At no time have I asked you to check your "fucking head," for example, so my observations seem to have put YOU into a seething rage. Sorry about…

Let's be honest, "clytie. " Troll types like yourself want a free pass while you pollute comment boards with completely unnecessary malice and hatred for…whomever (people you invariably don't know.) You get called on it, and then pretend the person who called you on it is the one with the problem. You really are…

Lack of discernment makes someone hate one. You hate someone you don't even know. Pathetic as well as idiotic.

And being discerning is not in yours.

I get it, idiocy in your genes!

Fuck yourself first, Schlomo, there's a good dunce!

Ugh. How about less Quincy Jones, and more discernment from you?

He loathes Michael Jackson? Wow, just tease away, he's clearly idiotic!

Hmmm, I wasn't defending Culkin's honor actually, though I can see where you may have thought that, and he quite likely deserves to be defended. Oh well, chalk that one up to a misunderstanding. Time to move on! But don't rule out getting some humor advice!

Well, to be fair, Mr. Partridge wants "normalcy" in his artists. Somebody get a broom and sweep Michelangelo and Van Gogh from the art museums (heck, might as well get rid of all of it tbh.) Get the spray can on the Beethoven and Mozart symphonies and the entirety of the greatest popular music too!

Oh, settle down, Jake. Try not to get too riled when someone points your factual errors in the right direction—quite lightheartedly too! (And you may want to get around to that concert sooner than later, cuz your humor is…well, it's jaded, Jake. Not Bill Murrayan, just jaded. Maybe that old faith in humanity needs…

Ignorance is bliss, isn't it? Or maybe just a twat's wishful thinking, eh? Take a look at what the crowd thought of him at his Madison Square Garden appearance in 2001, Jake my lad.

Or Mick Jagger, or David Bowie or Steven Tyler or Axl Rose or…ya know, androgynous sex appeal is huge in the music world—Jackson had no shortage of women swooning over him, that's for certain.

Unless of course, most of the adults around you are the broken ones.

An Equation: "Don't get the reference"= ignorant=better to form an informed opinion before speaking, but…no! = invariably, a person who tends to think lots and lots of things in this world are"creepy" and "ooh, I'm so scared all the time."

You do realize that any and all comments critical of Mr. Partridge's take on things have not seen the light of day on this comment board—for obvious reasons, it seems.